price performance wise: 4x 590s get about 30ms, and cost about 400 euros a peace, that`s 1600,-.
ofcourse there are other advantages, vram, power usage, but budget designers will have to choose i think
OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Octane 2022.1.1 nv535.98
x201t - gtx580 - egpu ec
Dell G5 - 16GB - dgpu GTX1060 - TB3 egpu @ 1060 / RTX 4090
Octane Render experiments - ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬
x201t - gtx580 - egpu ec
Dell G5 - 16GB - dgpu GTX1060 - TB3 egpu @ 1060 / RTX 4090
Octane Render experiments - ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬
For me one Titan would be cool enough. Just in case if there are heavy scenes flying in. But I can wait a bit until the price of a Titan drops to 70 percent in a couple of months 
So what comes after the Titan ladys and gentleman?
What is really crazy is the rising of VRam of gaming cards during the last 2 years.
Before, the VRam was always up to 2 GB. No big changes for multiple years.
Then there was the 580 with 3GB followed by the 680 with for and the Titan with 6GB.
That sets a new standart for VRam consumption.
So what comes after the Titan ladys and gentleman?
What is really crazy is the rising of VRam of gaming cards during the last 2 years.
Before, the VRam was always up to 2 GB. No big changes for multiple years.
Then there was the 580 with 3GB followed by the 680 with for and the Titan with 6GB.
That sets a new standart for VRam consumption.
At least you have more RAMmanalokos wrote:EVGA Geforce TITAN superclocked- Octane 1.11 - Pathtracing: 6.78 Ms/sec.
NVIDIA Geforce GTX 590 Octane 1.11 - Pathtracing: 6.76 Ms/sec.
Quite crappy considering it costs more than twice the price...
Win 11 Pro | i5 12600K | 32GB ram | 2x GTX 1080Ti + 3080Ti - studio driver 560.94| Modo/Blender/ZBrush/Daz/Poser
Here 2x evga superclocked titan. Octane 1.11:
PT: 12.80
PMC: 9.88
DL: 44.55
PT: 12.80
PMC: 9.88
DL: 44.55
intel i7 3770k // 2 x Evga Titan Superclocked 6gb Vram // 16gb RAM
http://www.octavioalonso.com
http://www.octavioalonso.com
it would be nice to see the score of the octane-cloud with the benchmark scene 
ciao beppe
ciao beppe
Question: why do you post the performance of the cards summed together?
It makes everything more confusing, and there is loss of information.
I beleive one should post the performance of each individual card, they should add up to the correct value, when summed all together.
It makes everything more confusing, and there is loss of information.
I beleive one should post the performance of each individual card, they should add up to the correct value, when summed all together.
Gainward GTX Titan oc (Core +200, mem +300). Octane 1.11
Pathtracing: 7.78Ms/s (no shadows).
Almost twice as fast as my oc GTX580 (3.96Ms/s).
Pathtracing: 7.78Ms/s (no shadows).
Almost twice as fast as my oc GTX580 (3.96Ms/s).
Win 11 Pro | i5 12600K | 32GB ram | 2x GTX 1080Ti + 3080Ti - studio driver 560.94| Modo/Blender/ZBrush/Daz/Poser
