Hello, guys!
Sorry for the stupid question, but where did you get the OctaneBench 3.03.4 ?
On the site I can see only version 2.17 available for download. Anв it doesn't see my GTX 1080 cards.
P.S. Ah, I just found it in the starting post of this thread. But why it is not on this page yet?
GTX_1080 benchmark
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
RTX 4090 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | 64GB | Win 11 23H2
Just installed my Gainward 1070 Golden Sample and got out of the box 131.51. Pretty impressive.
Edit. strange thing: 1070 is only running at 92-95% instead of 99-100 like my old 780 did. Any idea why this happens?
Edit: after some OC with after burner:
I expected scores around 117... but not this. oO
Edit. strange thing: 1070 is only running at 92-95% instead of 99-100 like my old 780 did. Any idea why this happens?
Edit: after some OC with after burner:
I expected scores around 117... but not this. oO
6850k // 32 GB // 1080, 1080 Ti, 2080 Ti // Win 10 // C4D 19.068
Guys, could you be so kind and post your results on the OctaneBench Results page , please!
https://render.otoy.com/octanebench/res ... ingleGPU=1
This would help enormously, to get a clearer overview and better comparability of the different GPU´s.
https://render.otoy.com/octanebench/res ... ingleGPU=1
This would help enormously, to get a clearer overview and better comparability of the different GPU´s.
Intel i7-970 @3,20 GHz / 24 GB RAM / 3 x EVGA GTX 580 - 3GB
Is there a way to submit the results manually? 1070 obviously isnt in the list at all.gueoct wrote:Guys, could you be so kind and post your results on the OctaneBench Results page , please!
https://render.otoy.com/octanebench/res ... ingleGPU=1
This would help enormously, to get a clearer overview and better comparability of the different GPU´s.
6850k // 32 GB // 1080, 1080 Ti, 2080 Ti // Win 10 // C4D 19.068
I recently bought two 1070's Evga Founders Ed.
Which single 1070 gives a benchmark of 122.88 with no OC In my good ventilated case the temps were 50C at load.
I'll test OC later on. And post some results as well.
First I was after buying 1080. But the prices were + ~%70 of 1070.. SO I changed my mind and went for double 1070.
I think those cards are perfect for me. Very cheap cards. Runs at very cool temps, need just one PCI-e power.
As per power.
The psu reports 247W usage when system is idle...
I rendered the benchmark with 680 + Titan(1st Gen). And and my PSU(AX1500i) reported 550 W usage at load. Those two cards used ~310W total.
Then I used just 2x1070 for the benchmark.. And PSU reported 470W usage. So they draw less power as well. And these used 225W
EDIT
I made an initial overclock to a 1070. Benchmark reported 135.53...
OC'ed using afterburner +500 to memclock gave me 4300 MHz
+ 230 to CoreClock gave 2100 MHz
Not bad at all I think...
Which single 1070 gives a benchmark of 122.88 with no OC In my good ventilated case the temps were 50C at load.
I'll test OC later on. And post some results as well.
First I was after buying 1080. But the prices were + ~%70 of 1070.. SO I changed my mind and went for double 1070.
I think those cards are perfect for me. Very cheap cards. Runs at very cool temps, need just one PCI-e power.
As per power.
The psu reports 247W usage when system is idle...
I rendered the benchmark with 680 + Titan(1st Gen). And and my PSU(AX1500i) reported 550 W usage at load. Those two cards used ~310W total.
Then I used just 2x1070 for the benchmark.. And PSU reported 470W usage. So they draw less power as well. And these used 225W
EDIT
I made an initial overclock to a 1070. Benchmark reported 135.53...
OC'ed using afterburner +500 to memclock gave me 4300 MHz
+ 230 to CoreClock gave 2100 MHz
Not bad at all I think...
My Portfolio
windows 10 Pro. |1070 + 1070 + 1070 + 1070 | i7 @4.5Ghz
windows 10 Pro. |1070 + 1070 + 1070 + 1070 | i7 @4.5Ghz
Here is my latest OC'in test on dual Evga 1070 FE.
I updated new Bios from Evga forums. After that I was able to get
OctaneBench Score : 281.50 (dual 1070)
Single 1070 OC Score ~140
That is so close to 980 Ti Maximum score (142) A little than Titan X(M) max score (149)
Beats 980 Ti & Titan X(M) in average scores... And Identical performace with TeslaM60(dualGPU)
I wasn't expecting that much from 1070's. IMO Best bang for buck
MSI AB. Settings...
Mem Clock 4387 MHz (+580)
Core clock 2130 MHz (+237)
Stable around 55C-58C
Fanspeed %50 - %60
Ambient room temp ~23C
Mind you the two 1070's are at the lowest PCI lanes. But they are performing pretty well. Especially the one under Titan (2nd from top) Time to ditch those old cards
I updated new Bios from Evga forums. After that I was able to get
OctaneBench Score : 281.50 (dual 1070)
Single 1070 OC Score ~140
That is so close to 980 Ti Maximum score (142) A little than Titan X(M) max score (149)
Beats 980 Ti & Titan X(M) in average scores... And Identical performace with TeslaM60(dualGPU)
I wasn't expecting that much from 1070's. IMO Best bang for buck
MSI AB. Settings...
Mem Clock 4387 MHz (+580)
Core clock 2130 MHz (+237)
Stable around 55C-58C
Fanspeed %50 - %60
Ambient room temp ~23C
Mind you the two 1070's are at the lowest PCI lanes. But they are performing pretty well. Especially the one under Titan (2nd from top) Time to ditch those old cards

My Portfolio
windows 10 Pro. |1070 + 1070 + 1070 + 1070 | i7 @4.5Ghz
windows 10 Pro. |1070 + 1070 + 1070 + 1070 | i7 @4.5Ghz
- BorisGoreta
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:45 pm
- Contact:
Hmmmm, with octane bench 2 my 980Ti is roughly the same speed as my TITAN X ( 132 )
but with octane bench 3 980Ti is 95 and TITAN X is 125 so there is a lot of difference.
Aren't 980Ti and TITAN X the same architecture ? Why is there such a big difference with octanebench v3 ?
but with octane bench 3 980Ti is 95 and TITAN X is 125 so there is a lot of difference.
Aren't 980Ti and TITAN X the same architecture ? Why is there such a big difference with octanebench v3 ?
19 x NVIDIA GTX http://www.borisgoreta.com
oguzbir wrote:Here is my latest OC'in test on dual Evga 1070 FE.
I updated new Bios from Evga forums. After that I was able to get
OctaneBench Score : 281.50 (dual 1070)
Single 1070 OC Score ~140
That is so close to 980 Ti Maximum score (142) A little than Titan X(M) max score (149)
Beats 980 Ti & Titan X(M) in average scores... And Identical performace with TeslaM60(dualGPU)
I wasn't expecting that much from 1070's. IMO Best bang for buck
MSI AB. Settings...
Mem Clock 4387 MHz (+580)
Core clock 2130 MHz (+237)
Stable around 55C-58C
Fanspeed %50 - %60
Ambient room temp ~23C
Mind you the two 1070's are at the lowest PCI lanes. But they are performing pretty well. Especially the one under Titan (2nd from top) Time to ditch those old cards
Uuuh, 4 cards next to each other? Is it not rather loud?
R9 7950x, 64GB DDR5 6000 MHz, 2x RTX 4090, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Kingston KC3000 2TB, Kingston KC3000 1TB, WD Caviar Gold 6TB, Win11 Pro 64bit
What about core voltage and power limit?oguzbir wrote:Here is my latest OC'in test on dual Evga 1070 FE.
I updated new Bios from Evga forums. After that I was able to get
OctaneBench Score : 281.50 (dual 1070)
Single 1070 OC Score ~140
That is so close to 980 Ti Maximum score (142) A little than Titan X(M) max score (149)
Beats 980 Ti & Titan X(M) in average scores... And Identical performace with TeslaM60(dualGPU)
I wasn't expecting that much from 1070's. IMO Best bang for buck
MSI AB. Settings...
Mem Clock 4387 MHz (+580)
Core clock 2130 MHz (+237)
Stable around 55C-58C
Fanspeed %50 - %60
Ambient room temp ~23C :
www.alexdimella.com IG @alexdimella