Which feature do you need the most?

by **paride4331** » Mon May 07, 2018 6:40 am

https://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=37045&start=440#p329702

by **coilbook** » Sat Jun 30, 2018 1:54 am

PLEASE ADD VOLUMETRIC LIGHTS !!!! I DONT SEE IT IN THE LIST

by **glimpse** » Mon Jul 02, 2018 9:43 am

coilbook wrote:PLEASE ADD VOLUMETRIC LIGHTS !!!! I DONT SEE IT IN THE LIST

Please show realworld example of "Volumetric lights".

You can already do this, just take Volume (with scattering material) + light (that's how it is done in the realwold) & You will have what You want.

by **coilbook** » Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:56 pm

glimpse wrote:
coilbook wrote:PLEASE ADD VOLUMETRIC LIGHTS !!!! I DONT SEE IT IN THE LIST

Please show realworld example of "Volumetric lights".

You can already do this, just take Volume (with scattering material) + light (that's how it is done in the realwold) & You will have what You want.

for creative purposes

by **nvision** » Fri Sep 07, 2018 2:06 pm

I think that a possibility to randomize volume density with a procedural texture would be awesome

It's perfectly shown on this video how it works in Cycles engine:
https://youtu.be/AXjE-t6dFZ8?t=145
I also posted in on the Blender Plugin subforum, but it seems that it's not only the plugin that lacks this functionality.
viewtopic.php?f=115&t=68702&p=345465#p345465

by **bepeg4d** » Fri Sep 07, 2018 3:31 pm

Hi nvidion,
in c4doctane you can do somthing similar:
http://www.aoktar.com/octane/Clouds.html
ciao Beppe

by **nvision** » Fri Sep 07, 2018 3:46 pm

@bepeg4d / Beppe
I know and it looks great

but I work in Blender and there's no possibility of doing that.

by **Despot** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:49 am

I really wish you'd add a threshold or a tightener to Bloom and Glare.

The ability to be able to focus the effect on just the brightest pixels in the image gives a much more realistic result.

by **Elvissuperstar007** » Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:11 am

+1000

by **Goldorak** » Tue Oct 30, 2018 6:45 am

nvision wrote:I think that a possibility to randomize volume density with a procedural texture would be awesome
It's perfectly shown on this video how it works in Cycles engine:
https://youtu.be/AXjE-t6dFZ8?t=145
I also posted in on the Blender Plugin subforum, but it seems that it's not only the plugin that lacks this functionality.
viewtopic.php?f=115&t=68702&p=345465#p345465

It's doable - this is part of the 2018.1 roadmap as of right now (in one of the later XB releases closer to RC1). The reason we didn't do this sooner is because we wanted to first develop a much faster rendering path for fully procedural volumetrics (slated in the 2018.1 version for many similar related uses) that could enable this with the least possible speed hit - as a bonus, we should be able to then feed OSL shaders into this for truly crazy user driven effects.

Which feature do you need the most?

Tweet

Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Re: Which feature do you need the most?

Who is online