Hi all,
I'm running Cinema 4D 2025.0.2 and OctaneX 2024.1-R3 on macOS Sequoia 15.1. This is running on a Mac Studio M2 Ultra with 76 GPU Cores and 128 GB RAM.
No matter the render settings in regards to priority I can't get Octane to utilize more than 50% of my GPUs. Is there any known issues like this or anyone else having the same problem?
If I render a test scene in OctaneX Standalone 2024.1 it maxes out my GPUs.
NEW: Octane X - is finally here! [MEGA FAQ THREAD]
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the slowdown here, the GPU usage is 100% in both Live View and Picture Viewer, in C4D 2025.0.2 and c4doctane 2024.1-R3... but I'm working in Sonoma 14.7, not Sequoia:
Have you tried with different scenes?
ciao,
Beppe
ciao,
Beppe
Thanks!m0dm0d wrote:Octane Standalone 2024.1 / OctaneXBench_VolumeDenoiser
MacBook Pro M4 Max (40 core): 18s
(M4 Max with Realtime 16)
MacBook Pro M3 Max (40 core): 22s
(M3 Max with Realtime 19)
Did you connect both MacBook Pro to power supply during test?
ciao,
Beppe
Yep, Power supply on both (same results whether 'automatic' or 'high power' in system settings).bepeg4d wrote:m0dm0d wrote: Thanks!
Did you connect both MacBook Pro to power supply during test?
ciao,
Beppe
Standalone 2024.1
M3 Max (Sonoma 14.1)
M4 Max (Sequoia 15.1)
I can't get near 15s with M3 Max (which you have listed), so I'm guessing that was an earlier Standalone version?
Would be great to see M-series results replaced with the latest standalone (if you can collect them).
That said, the M4 Max feels significantly faster than M3 Max in C4D Live Viewer C4D 2024.4.1 / Studio 2024.1-R3).
So I'm pretty happy with this upgrade!
-
davidvonbehr
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 1:11 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Strange results with your MacBooks :-/m0dm0d wrote:Yep, Power supply on both (same results whether 'automatic' or 'high power' in system settings).bepeg4d wrote:m0dm0d wrote: Thanks!
Did you connect both MacBook Pro to power supply during test?
ciao,
Beppe
Standalone 2024.1
M3 Max (Sonoma 14.1)
M4 Max (Sequoia 15.1)
I can't get near 15s with M3 Max (which you have listed), so I'm guessing that was an earlier Standalone version?
Would be great to see M-series results replaced with the latest standalone (if you can collect them).
That said, the M4 Max feels significantly faster than M3 Max in C4D Live Viewer C4D 2024.4.1 / Studio 2024.1-R3).
So I'm pretty happy with this upgrade!
My MacBook Pro M3 Max 40-Core: 15 sec
My Neu MacBook Pro M4 Max 30-Core: 12 sec
Both plugged in or on battery with same results.
Thanks davidvonbehr for confirmation on M3 Max result, and for M4 Max 30 core result!
Here is the updated chart:
Happy Mac GPU rendering!
ciao,
Beppe
Here is the updated chart:
ciao,
Beppe
Have you installed a macOS beta update?
ciao,
Beppe
ciao,
Beppe
-
davidvonbehr
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 1:11 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Hi Beppe,
sorry, it is a M4 Max 40-Core … it was a typo.
sorry, it is a M4 Max 40-Core … it was a typo.
No problem1
Here is the corrected version:
Happy Mac GPU rendering!
ciao,
Beppe
Here is the corrected version:
ciao,
Beppe