Playing with instancing placement

Forums: Playing with instancing placement
Discuss or ask critique about your current works
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.


For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.

Re: Playing with instancing placement

Postby Tugpsx » Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:12 am

Tugpsx Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:12 am
Very nice, thanks for all your help and tips on this. One thing I did notice is I was using a flat plane for the displacement surface, whereas you used a rectangular box. Switching to a rectangle proved to give better depth and a more realistic look since there was also no ripping.

BackyardTest6.jpg
Backyard grass updated
Dell Win Vista 32 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS135M | Core2 Duo T7500 2.20GHz | 4GB
CyberPowerPC Win 7 64| NVIDIA GTX660Ti (3G) GTX480(1.5G) | 16GB
Tugpsx
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:04 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Playing with instancing placement

Postby domusbiro » Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:28 am

domusbiro Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:28 am
you're welcome ;) btw there is still ripping but the box keeps it dark.

cheers,

N.
domusbiro
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:48 am

Re: Playing with instancing placement

Postby domusbiro » Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:28 pm

domusbiro Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:28 pm
Comparing the v2.24 vs v3.0 alpha fog effect, I have to say that the 3.0 does the job noticeably faster.
Attachments
road 01v3.jpg
v.3.0 alpha
road02a.jpg
v2.24.2
domusbiro
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:48 am

Re: Playing with instancing placement

Postby domusbiro » Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:41 am

domusbiro Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:41 am
Scandi House by Auhaus Architects, work in progress. ArchiCAD+Sketchup+Octane Standalone 3.08.3
C&C are most welcome

Cheers,

H
Attachments
105.jpg
103.jpg
102.jpg
101.jpg
domusbiro
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:48 am

Re: Playing with instancing placement

Postby domusbiro » Sun Nov 25, 2018 9:13 pm

domusbiro Sun Nov 25, 2018 9:13 pm
update on the Scandi house case study. Octane 4 with denoiser
Attachments
402.jpg
autumn update
domusbiro
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:48 am
Previous

Return to Works In Progress


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 1 guest

Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:24 pm [ UTC ]