Thanks havensole, for reply.

So as I understand it, the Beta license SHOULD be upgraded to a COMMERCIAL
license - when it is ready. And that would likely be HALF price of 200 Euros, or about
100 MORE Euros { in addition to the BETA cost }.

What I am unclear on, still, is the full permissions of ...

short answer is: 1) no difference


so its full commercial license then? Good.


and 2) anything you're able to do

ANYTHING?

How about max number of cores? using on Render farm?

How many machines can it be installed on?

thanks!

I cant find any information on the licenses.

What is the difference between the
v1.0 Studio BETA Program license - and a COMMERCIAL license?

What does the BETA license allow?

thanks

still no notebook driver for win 7 64 bit i see.

b. Make a plug-in version of Octane available for Blender.

Not a bad idea. The new blender version 2.5 is pretty hot.
They finally overcame their main problem - the old twisted GUI.
check it out!

oh, okay thanks

Yeah my 250 is not listed there.

BUT I thought you needed the DEVELOPER driver, { one of the
three listed in the directions with Octane - to run it.

that driver has NOT been updated to win 7 - 64 afaik.

Oh,

I should add, octane, says no cuda found.
That other Cuda testing app found it fine, I think.

also,

will that driver really make a difference. Cuda already reads enabled.
I thought the requirement for Octane, was that DEVELOPERS driver?

thanks

Re: Cant get alpha to work! NO CUDA FOUND driver for gts-250m?
Hi,
I had a look to see what the hardware difference between a GTS250M and a GTS260M is and it appears they are the same except the 250 is clocked 10% slower and uses slower GDDR3 rather than 5.
Really I dont know why the 250 isnt in ...

As a dwarf to a giant

Ha!

I dont care if its a dwarf , if its significantly faster, equal or better
results { for animation } , and easier to program.

Ps Has anyone posted animation results, and speed comparisons,
for Octane?