Hi all,
I posted a new version which should work under Linux environment.
I don't feel very good with Linux and I made those changes with really few experience, so could someone make some tests to validate that it works under Linux environment.
Also, duno if those changes also apply to Mac environment, so maybe someone with a mac could make a quick test just in case it works otherwise, the Mac version will come later on.
Thanks
Beta 2.2 RC1: Blender 2.49 Export Script testing thread
- enricocerica
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:32 pm
- Contact:
Modeling system : I7 32GB Windows 10 & Fujitsu Celsius H720
GPU : 1x Gigabyte GTX580 3GB + 1x MSI GTX780 3GB + 1x PALIT GTX780 6GB +1x Asus Stix GTX1070 8GB
http://www.myline.be
GPU : 1x Gigabyte GTX580 3GB + 1x MSI GTX780 3GB + 1x PALIT GTX780 6GB +1x Asus Stix GTX1070 8GB
http://www.myline.be
- mib2berlin
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:18 pm
- Location: Germany
Juhu, first tests with linux work wonderfull. Single rendering, sun, camera etc. work as expected.
Animation works also.
Thank you and the team, mib
Animation works also.
Thank you and the team, mib
Opensuse Leap 42.3/64 i5-3570K 16 GB
GTX 760 4 GB Driver: 430.31
Octane 3.08 Blender Octane
GTX 760 4 GB Driver: 430.31
Octane 3.08 Blender Octane
I've been testing on Linux with a simple animation where only the camera moves, and if I do a individual render works correctly, but doing the animation, the camera does not move, the parameters are unchanged between frames.
Edited (had made a mistake, this is not correct, had used another scene where the camera did not move only the object, therefore the problem lies elsewhere. If I press render the object moves to the position of the frame, but if I press animation, always leaves the object in the same place)
By the way, I ask about the time it takes to boot octane (in linux, in windows same is not true). Is it something that can be fixed in the future? Is it a problem of drivers not up to you?
I think if you can not avoid, what can be done is to leave the executable resident, and invoke it again to only have to load the scene, not initialized again. 15 seconds may not seem like much, but in a small animation of 1000 frames, this is four hours.
Cheers
Edited (had made a mistake, this is not correct, had used another scene where the camera did not move only the object, therefore the problem lies elsewhere. If I press render the object moves to the position of the frame, but if I press animation, always leaves the object in the same place)
By the way, I ask about the time it takes to boot octane (in linux, in windows same is not true). Is it something that can be fixed in the future? Is it a problem of drivers not up to you?
I think if you can not avoid, what can be done is to leave the executable resident, and invoke it again to only have to load the scene, not initialized again. 15 seconds may not seem like much, but in a small animation of 1000 frames, this is four hours.
Cheers
LiVux 64bit | Geforce GTX260 Core 216 and GTX470 | i7 860 | 8Gb | Drivers 275.09.07 | Cuda 4.0.17
I've done more testing, and the problem not appears to be exporter, because the file _anim.obj changes, but always render out the same. It could be another problem of RC1 on linux?
Cheers
Cheers
LiVux 64bit | Geforce GTX260 Core 216 and GTX470 | i7 860 | 8Gb | Drivers 275.09.07 | Cuda 4.0.17
Well, not if I'm going crazy, but this is what I found.
If I run blender from the folder where I have the scene, everything works fine.
If I run it being in the folder where I have octane, was mentioned earlier passes. A frame work, the animation does not (no errors reported, simply always rendering the same frame)
Cheers
If I run blender from the folder where I have the scene, everything works fine.
If I run it being in the folder where I have octane, was mentioned earlier passes. A frame work, the animation does not (no errors reported, simply always rendering the same frame)
Cheers
LiVux 64bit | Geforce GTX260 Core 216 and GTX470 | i7 860 | 8Gb | Drivers 275.09.07 | Cuda 4.0.17
I second the above request. I suspect that the GUI library is the culprit that forces Octane boot up to take so much time (is it statically linked?). Beta 2.3 should have a full command line options and can run in headless mode, but still to have it resident in the memory would be the best option.livuxman wrote: By the way, I ask about the time it takes to boot octane (in linux, in windows same is not true). Is it something that can be fixed in the future? Is it a problem of drivers not up to you?
I think if you can not avoid, what can be done is to leave the executable resident, and invoke it again to only have to load the scene, not initialized again. 15 seconds may not seem like much, but in a small animation of 1000 frames, this is four hours.
Cheers
I haven't used the supplied script coz I just use my own simple export scripts (I'm using blender 2.5) and I don't have that problem. That's from the same output script of the same scene, is it? Could it be the relative path?livuxman wrote:Well, not if I'm going crazy, but this is what I found.
If I run blender from the folder where I have the scene, everything works fine.
If I run it being in the folder where I have octane, was mentioned earlier passes. A frame work, the animation does not (no errors reported, simply always rendering the same frame)
Cheers
Fedora 17 | 16 GB RAM | Quadro 4000 | driver = nvidia 304.xx & CUDA 4.0
can I suggest that in the scripts menu this appears under rendering?
or if possible rendering and export?
or if possible rendering and export?
Kubuntu 9.04 | Nvidia Gainward 9500 GT | Intel Core2 Quad 2.40 Ghz | 4 GB RAM
- enricocerica
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:32 pm
- Contact:
Hi James, what are you talking about ?James wrote:can I suggest that in the scripts menu this appears under rendering?
or if possible rendering and export?
Modeling system : I7 32GB Windows 10 & Fujitsu Celsius H720
GPU : 1x Gigabyte GTX580 3GB + 1x MSI GTX780 3GB + 1x PALIT GTX780 6GB +1x Asus Stix GTX1070 8GB
http://www.myline.be
GPU : 1x Gigabyte GTX580 3GB + 1x MSI GTX780 3GB + 1x PALIT GTX780 6GB +1x Asus Stix GTX1070 8GB
http://www.myline.be
- enricocerica
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:32 pm
- Contact:
Could you give me more information about the context and about your workflow ?saikafu wrote:i've found a new problem .
the sun direction seems not change automatic..
i've press the "R" button but nothing changed..
Modeling system : I7 32GB Windows 10 & Fujitsu Celsius H720
GPU : 1x Gigabyte GTX580 3GB + 1x MSI GTX780 3GB + 1x PALIT GTX780 6GB +1x Asus Stix GTX1070 8GB
http://www.myline.be
GPU : 1x Gigabyte GTX580 3GB + 1x MSI GTX780 3GB + 1x PALIT GTX780 6GB +1x Asus Stix GTX1070 8GB
http://www.myline.be