Lego Car Animation rendered with OctaneRender for 3ds max(R)

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.


For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
PeterCGS
Licensed Customer
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:36 pm

Refracty wrote: The motionblur could be easily applied in post with a motion vector pass.
.
What are you talking about!?! Of course be able to render motionblur is one of the most important factors for any 3D render in order to be successful for any kind of commercial/feature work. Why you think Arnold is so loved? It crunch out motionblur like none other ;)

As long as you have opaque, large objects without any kind of DOF (DOF in post) your fine with doing MB afterwards.. But as soon as your doing transparent objects, small thin objects, extreme DOF.. Well then you can sit and stare at your motion vector pass as much as you want hehe.. Give us Mooootionblur!
Win7, i7 980 Hexacore, 24GB RAM, 3xEVGA SC 670 GTX 4GB
User avatar
face
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:10 pm
Location: Germany

PeterCGS wrote: What are you talking about!?! Of course be able to render motionblur is one of the most important factors for any 3D render in order to be successful for any kind of commercial/feature work. Why you think Arnold is so loved? It crunch out motionblur like none other ;)

As long as you have opaque, large objects without any kind of DOF (DOF in post) your fine with doing MB afterwards.. But as soon as your doing transparent objects, small thin objects, extreme DOF.. Well then you can sit and stare at your motion vector pass as much as you want hehe.. Give us Mooootionblur!
I think, at first the other plugins must have the same status as this one, then you can add new functions.
It is a lot of work to integrate this into eg. Softimage because there are some heavy problems ;)

face
Win10 Pro, Driver 378.78, Softimage 2015SP2 & Octane 3.05 RC1,
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
User avatar
Refracty
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1599
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: 3D-Visualisierung Köln
Contact:

PeterCGS wrote:What are you talking about!?! Of course be able to render motionblur is one of the most important factors for any 3D render in order to be successful for any kind of commercial/feature work.
I made the experience that 90 percent of the tasks involving motion blur can be solved faster and more flexible with motion blur vector passes but for sure to have this feature within Octane is useful for the rest 10 percent.
Daniel
Licensed Customer
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:52 am

Very nice! I hope Blender won't be ignored by the community using Cycles as an excuse not to develop an OR plugin.
Core i7 950 @3.07GHz | GTX 460 2GB | 12GB RAM | Window 7 x64
PeterCGS
Licensed Customer
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:36 pm

face wrote:
PeterCGS wrote: I think, at first the other plugins must have the same status as this one, then you can add new functions.
It is a lot of work to integrate this into eg. Softimage because there are some heavy problems ;)

face
Haha, well I was only joking about the missing motion blur ;) No pressure.. I trust you solve the Softimage integration :lol: It will be sooo awesome.. ICE and Octane = luv! haha
Win7, i7 980 Hexacore, 24GB RAM, 3xEVGA SC 670 GTX 4GB
PeterCGS
Licensed Customer
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:36 pm

Refracty wrote:
PeterCGS wrote:What are you talking about!?! Of course be able to render motionblur is one of the most important factors for any 3D render in order to be successful for any kind of commercial/feature work.
I made the experience that 90 percent of the tasks involving motion blur can be solved faster and more flexible with motion blur vector passes but for sure to have this feature within Octane is useful for the rest 10 percent.
Well, thats just why motionblur for Octane is so interesting. It will change the workflow completely.. Before I never ever ever rendered with DOF, because the time penalty was to heavy... Now I crunch out just beautiful extreme DOF frames in 10 seconds.. I cant barely measure the difference between heavy DOF and non DOF in Octane, the diffference is neglible.. So Im pretty sure this will turn around your 90/10 to a 0/100 ;)
Win7, i7 980 Hexacore, 24GB RAM, 3xEVGA SC 670 GTX 4GB
Shaolee
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:04 am

I can do nothing but agree with PeterCGS. Motion blur is something that is used in every single animation. Doing it in comp is most of the time not possible, because of lots of reasons, transparent objects etc. Having the three "realtime GI, motion blur and depth of field" is what will make Octane something a lot of people will want to use! Don't get me wrong doing what Octane does right now is awesome. But to really be a great tool I think motion blur is key. Everything that moves should have motion blur. Theres is pretty much no tweaking needed only amount and being able to shift it backwards and forwards. So the point in doing it in comp feels pretty old. Its just a workaround.

Only someone doing mainly stills would argue that motion blur is best done in comp.

Passes would be be nice. I also think deep images would be great. Since all major compositing softwares are starting to incorporate tools for working with deep images that should be the way to go for Octane as well.
User avatar
t_3
Posts: 2871
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:37 pm

Shaolee wrote:Everything that moves should have motion blur.
i'm pretty happy, that my car is not getting blurred if it moves around fast :lol:
scnr...
The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply

1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
Daniel
Licensed Customer
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:52 am

Well, considering OR already has motion blur for turntable animations...
Core i7 950 @3.07GHz | GTX 460 2GB | 12GB RAM | Window 7 x64
User avatar
cglittenberg
Licensed Customer
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Please...Please...Please!!!!!!! say that you are also going to be making a plugin for C4D!!!!!!! I will buy it immediatly....regardless of cost!!!
Dr. Carl Glittenberg
Glittenberg Medical Visualizations
Intel(R) Core(TM)i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80Ghz 2.80Ghz 6,00 GB RAM Windows 7 Home Premium Nvidia GeForce GTX 480
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”