Caustics test - 100k spp both 540p and 4320p using PT kernel

Forums: Caustics test - 100k spp both 540p and 4320p using PT kernel
Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB

Caustics test - 100k spp both 540p and 4320p using PT kernel

Postby nuno1980 » Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:06 pm

nuno1980 Fri Oct 04, 2024 9:06 pm
Hello. I'm using OctaneRender plugin for Blender v29.14 with my GeForce RTX 4090. :D

At our sun source, 100k spp (samples per pixel) at Path Tracing (PT) kernel - 540p vs 4320p:
caustics test - 540p (8x zoom) vs 4320p.png


4320p is much better caustics than 540p. :o :mrgreen: But 4320p is ~39x longer render time than 540p but 4320p is 64x higher resolution screen than 540p. Therefore, 4320p has 1.6x more performance efficiency. :)

Best regards. ;)
Last edited by nuno1980 on Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 19" Samtron 19" :|
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: Caustics test - 100k spp both 540p and 4320p using PT

Postby pixym » Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:01 am

pixym Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:01 am
What kernel did you use ?
From what I have seen, photon tracing is far quicker for caustics rendering.
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
pixym
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Re: Caustics test - 100k spp both 540p and 4320p using PT

Postby nuno1980 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:49 pm

nuno1980 Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:49 pm
pixym wrote:What kernel did you use ?
PT is path tracing. :)

From what I have seen, photon tracing is far quicker for caustics rendering.
I knew this kernel but unfortunately, Photon can't render any *variable* caustics on glossy floor and/or ground with the roughness of less than +/-0.4 - learn Variable caustics (new): Path Tracing vs Photon Tracing. ;)
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 19" Samtron 19" :|
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: Caustics test - 100k spp both 540p and 4320p using PT kernel

Postby pixym » Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:51 pm

pixym Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:51 pm
My bad, I did not even notice « PT » in the title :shock:
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
pixym
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Return to General Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests

Sat Dec 14, 2024 7:34 pm [ UTC ]