OctaneBench® 2025.2 - 1x RTX 4090 RTX ON + 3x RTX 5070 Ti RTX ON 1 result
| Maximum | 3820.17 | Average | 3820.17 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 3820.17 | Median | 3820.17 |
| GPU Model | No. GPUs | Compute Capability |
OctaneRender Support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2020 | 2019 | v4 | |||
| RTX 4090 (RTX ON) | 1 | 8.9 | ✔ | 2020.1.5 | X | X |
| RTX 5070 Ti (RTX ON) | 3 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Kernel | Score #2 | Weight #3 | Sub-total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Info Channels | 5542 | 10 % | 554.18 |
| Direct Lighting | 3702 | 40 % | 1480.86 |
| Path Tracing | 3570 | 50 % | 1785.13 |
| Total Score #2 | 3820.17 | ||
| Scene | Kernel | Ms/s #4 | Score #2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Info Channels | 2856.65 | 5545 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Direct Lighting | 688.07 | 3866 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Path Tracing | 325.87 | 3816 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Info Channels | 2938.84 | 3418 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Direct Lighting | 659.38 | 3132 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Path Tracing | 584.37 | 3015 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Info Channels | 2676.31 | 8526 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Direct Lighting | 624.78 | 4108 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Path Tracing | 541.72 | 4193 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Info Channels | 3076.40 | 4679 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Direct Lighting | 512.48 | 3703 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Path Tracing | 438.07 | 3257 |
These values are calculated from the averages of all submissions and may not be representative of actual performance.
1 result
- #1 What score is recommended for Octane?
-
This depends on your scene complexity and time-frame, but we recommended a score no lower than 45 for good render performance.
Please note that cards must have a score of 20 or higher to meet Octane's minimal performance requirements. While cards below this level may still be compatible, Octane's performance will be significantly impacted. - #2 What does the score value mean?
-
The score is calculated from the measured speed (Ms/s or mega samples per second), relative to the speed we measured for a GTX 980.
If the score is under 100, the GPU(s) is/are slower than the GTX 980 we used as reference, and if it's more the GPU(s) is/are faster.
- #3 What does the weight value mean?
-
The weight determines how each kernel's score affects the final score, and kernels that have higher usage are weighted higher.
- #4 What is Ms/s?
-
Ms/s is mega-samples per second, this value is the average of all the results uploaded to OctaneRender for this/these GPU(s).