OctaneBench® 2025.2 - 1x RTX 4090 RTX ON + 2x RTX 5090 RTX ON 6 results
| Maximum | 5090.74 | Average | 4809.81 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 4681.04 | Median | 4689.99 |
| GPU Model | No. GPUs | Compute Capability |
OctaneRender Support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2020 | 2019 | v4 | |||
| RTX 4090 (RTX ON) | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| RTX 5090 (RTX ON) | 2 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Kernel | Score #2 | Weight #3 | Sub-total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Info Channels | 7125 | 10 % | 712.49 |
| Direct Lighting | 4661 | 40 % | 1864.33 |
| Path Tracing | 4466 | 50 % | 2232.99 |
| Total Score #2 | 4809.81 | ||
| Scene | Kernel | Ms/s #4 | Score #2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Info Channels | 3629.66 | 7045 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Direct Lighting | 875.54 | 4919 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Path Tracing | 409.43 | 4794 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Info Channels | 3785.34 | 4402 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Direct Lighting | 831.21 | 3949 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Path Tracing | 728.27 | 3758 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Info Channels | 3456.92 | 11013 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Direct Lighting | 788.56 | 5184 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Path Tracing | 689.12 | 5334 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Info Channels | 3970.89 | 6039 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Direct Lighting | 635.44 | 4591 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Path Tracing | 535.05 | 3978 |
These values are calculated from the averages of all submissions and may not be representative of actual performance.
Score Distribution
Results
Score
- #1 What score is recommended for Octane?
-
This depends on your scene complexity and time-frame, but we recommended a score no lower than 45 for good render performance.
Please note that cards must have a score of 20 or higher to meet Octane's minimal performance requirements. While cards below this level may still be compatible, Octane's performance will be significantly impacted. - #2 What does the score value mean?
-
The score is calculated from the measured speed (Ms/s or mega samples per second), relative to the speed we measured for a GTX 980.
If the score is under 100, the GPU(s) is/are slower than the GTX 980 we used as reference, and if it's more the GPU(s) is/are faster.
- #3 What does the weight value mean?
-
The weight determines how each kernel's score affects the final score, and kernels that have higher usage are weighted higher.
- #4 What is Ms/s?
-
Ms/s is mega-samples per second, this value is the average of all the results uploaded to OctaneRender for this/these GPU(s).