OctaneBench® 2025.2 - 1x RTX 3090 Raytracing ON + 1x RTX 5090 Raytracing ON 27 results
| Maximum | 2419.53 | Average | 2364.76 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 2301.29 | Median | 2379.57 |
| GPU Model | No. GPUs | Compute Capability |
OctaneRender Support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2020 | 2019 | v4 | |||
| RTX 3090 (Raytracing ON) | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| RTX 5090 (Raytracing ON) | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Kernel | Score #2 | Weight #3 | Sub-total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Info Channels | 3583 | 10 % | 358.31 |
| Direct Lighting | 2366 | 40 % | 946.41 |
| Path Tracing | 2268 | 50 % | 1134.10 |
| Total Score #2 | 2438.82 | ||
| Scene | Kernel | Ms/s #4 | Score #2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Info Channels | 1746.19 | 3389 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Direct Lighting | 430.51 | 2419 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Path Tracing | 199.28 | 2333 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Info Channels | 1988.07 | 2312 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Direct Lighting | 434.69 | 2065 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Path Tracing | 379.85 | 1960 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Info Channels | 1778.49 | 5666 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Direct Lighting | 413.01 | 2715 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Path Tracing | 362.45 | 2805 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Info Channels | 1949.65 | 2965 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Direct Lighting | 313.49 | 2265 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Path Tracing | 265.50 | 1974 |
These values are calculated from the averages of all submissions and may not be representative of actual performance.
Score Distribution
Results
Score
- #1 What score is recommended for Octane?
-
This depends on your scene complexity and time-frame, but we recommended a score no lower than 45 for good render performance.
Please note that cards must have a score of 20 or higher to meet Octane's minimal performance requirements. While cards below this level may still be compatible, Octane's performance will be significantly impacted. - #2 What does the score value mean?
-
The score is calculated from the measured speed (Ms/s or mega samples per second), relative to the speed we measured for a GTX 980.
If the score is under 100, the GPU(s) is/are slower than the GTX 980 we used as reference, and if it's more the GPU(s) is/are faster.
- #3 What does the weight value mean?
-
The weight determines how each kernel's score affects the final score, and kernels that have higher usage are weighted higher.
- #4 What is Ms/s?
-
Ms/s is mega-samples per second, this value is the average of all the results uploaded to OctaneRender for this/these GPU(s).