OctaneBench® 2025.2 - 1x RTX 3090 Raytracing ON + 1x RTX 4090 Raytracing ON 9 results
| Maximum | 1993.88 | Average | 1924.22 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 1628.66 | Median | 1963.86 |
| GPU Model | No. GPUs | Compute Capability |
OctaneRender Support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2020 | 2019 | v4 | |||
| RTX 3090 (Raytracing ON) | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| RTX 4090 (Raytracing ON) | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Kernel | Score #2 | Weight #3 | Sub-total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Info Channels | 4198 | 10 % | 419.75 |
| Direct Lighting | 2812 | 40 % | 1124.71 |
| Path Tracing | 2743 | 50 % | 1371.65 |
| Total Score #2 | 2916.12 | ||
| Scene | Kernel | Ms/s #4 | Score #2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Info Channels | 1392.40 | 2703 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Direct Lighting | 353.20 | 1984 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Path Tracing | 165.98 | 1944 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Info Channels | 2948.72 | 3429 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Direct Lighting | 667.40 | 3171 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Path Tracing | 592.86 | 3059 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Info Channels | 2625.22 | 8363 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Direct Lighting | 644.61 | 4238 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Path Tracing | 559.63 | 4332 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Info Channels | 1509.08 | 2295 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Direct Lighting | 256.62 | 1854 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Path Tracing | 220.45 | 1639 |
These values are calculated from the averages of all submissions and may not be representative of actual performance.
Score Distribution
Results
Score
- #1 What score is recommended for Octane?
-
This depends on your scene complexity and time-frame, but we recommended a score no lower than 45 for good render performance.
Please note that cards must have a score of 20 or higher to meet Octane's minimal performance requirements. While cards below this level may still be compatible, Octane's performance will be significantly impacted. - #2 What does the score value mean?
-
The score is calculated from the measured speed (Ms/s or mega samples per second), relative to the speed we measured for a GTX 980.
If the score is under 100, the GPU(s) is/are slower than the GTX 980 we used as reference, and if it's more the GPU(s) is/are faster.
- #3 What does the weight value mean?
-
The weight determines how each kernel's score affects the final score, and kernels that have higher usage are weighted higher.
- #4 What is Ms/s?
-
Ms/s is mega-samples per second, this value is the average of all the results uploaded to OctaneRender for this/these GPU(s).