OctaneBench® 2025.2 - 1x RTX 3050 Raytracing ON + 1x RTX 4070 Raytracing ON 1 result
| Maximum | 801.85 | Average | 801.85 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 801.85 | Median | 801.85 |
| GPU Model | No. GPUs | Compute Capability |
OctaneRender Support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2020 | 2019 | v4 | |||
| RTX 3050 (Raytracing ON) | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| RTX 4070 (Raytracing ON) | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
| Kernel | Score #2 | Weight #3 | Sub-total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Info Channels | 1107 | 10 % | 110.69 |
| Direct Lighting | 783 | 40 % | 313.29 |
| Path Tracing | 756 | 50 % | 377.87 |
| Total Score #2 | 801.85 | ||
| Scene | Kernel | Ms/s #4 | Score #2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Info Channels | 563.49 | 1094 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Direct Lighting | 142.91 | 803 |
| Interior (by Julia Lynen) | Path Tracing | 66.85 | 783 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Info Channels | 602.93 | 701 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Direct Lighting | 139.84 | 664 |
| Idea (by Julio Cayetaño) | Path Tracing | 124.74 | 644 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Info Channels | 526.59 | 1678 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Direct Lighting | 135.27 | 889 |
| ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev) | Path Tracing | 117.81 | 912 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Info Channels | 628.07 | 955 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Direct Lighting | 107.45 | 776 |
| Box (by Enrico Cerica) | Path Tracing | 92.09 | 685 |
These values are calculated from the averages of all submissions and may not be representative of actual performance.
1 result
- #1 What score is recommended for Octane?
-
This depends on your scene complexity and time-frame, but we recommended a score no lower than 45 for good render performance.
Please note that cards must have a score of 20 or higher to meet Octane's minimal performance requirements. While cards below this level may still be compatible, Octane's performance will be significantly impacted. - #2 What does the score value mean?
-
The score is calculated from the measured speed (Ms/s or mega samples per second), relative to the speed we measured for a GTX 980.
If the score is under 100, the GPU(s) is/are slower than the GTX 980 we used as reference, and if it's more the GPU(s) is/are faster.
- #3 What does the weight value mean?
-
The weight determines how each kernel's score affects the final score, and kernels that have higher usage are weighted higher.
- #4 What is Ms/s?
-
Ms/s is mega-samples per second, this value is the average of all the results uploaded to OctaneRender for this/these GPU(s).