OTOY Forums

Community Forums for OTOY Customers
https://render.otoy.com/forum/

GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

https://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1164

Page 9 of 20

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 8:37 pm
by Amplitude
Well compared to my previews benchmark, beta 2.2 is super fast.
Are you sure you're using pathtracing? Because the new benchmark scene file has directlighing turned on by default...

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 8:39 pm
by Maryus3D
Well I'v just downloaded the 2.2 scenes. I thought it was the same. So is the light fault for the big differences? And yes I'm using the directlight. So, I'm doing something wrong? I'm noob to octane :P.

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 8:46 pm
by Amplitude
yep you have to turn pathtracing on, it's much more computing intensive. Directlighting is more for previewing.

this little video explains all the settings required for comparative benchmark.
[vimeo]http://www.vimeo.com/10699771[/vimeo]

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 9:01 pm
by Maryus3D
Ok I'll try out. 10x for the video :D .

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 9:21 pm
by Amplitude
you're welcome.

by the way here's mine, no 470 but it can still keep up :D
Amplitude wrote:-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTHOR: Amplitude

OS: Windows 7 Pro 64bit

Software: Octane v1.022 b2.2 - 64bit

MACHINE: INTEL Core2Quad 3.4 Ghz

PC RAM: 8 GB

CPU: INTEL qx6700 4 x 3.4 Ghz

CPU THREAD : 4

CPU TEMP (Core min/max) : 42°C - 63°C

--------

GPU: 2x Nvidia Evga 285 GTX Superclocked - 2048 MB RAM

Cores: 2x 240

GPU CLOCK: 675/1548 MHz

GPU TEMP : 82°C

RENDERTIME: 11m 07sec
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 8:48 am
by justix
Following amplitude video I had a go with my GTX470 MSI drivers Forceware 197.75 on WIN7 64Bit and I have the same result of my XP32 installation with 1 minute difference.
The odd thing is that I see that I got some sort of noise still going on, both 32 and 64 bit same results...4000 samples :?:

Xp32 13mins.30
Win7 64 14Min27

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 9:15 am
by radiance
justix wrote:Following amplitude video I had a go with my GTX470 MSI drivers Forceware 197.75 on WIN7 64Bit and I have the same result of my XP32 installation with 1 minute difference.
The odd thing is that I see that I got some sort of noise still going on, both 32 and 64 bit same results...4000 samples :?:

Xp32 13mins.30
Win7 64 14Min27
that scene's glossyness is way higher though...
it looks different than the others, is it the one from the new 2.2 demosuite, with pathtracing enabled ?

Radiance

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 9:28 am
by justix
radiance wrote:
justix wrote:Following amplitude video I had a go with my GTX470 MSI drivers Forceware 197.75 on WIN7 64Bit and I have the same result of my XP32 installation with 1 minute difference.
The odd thing is that I see that I got some sort of noise still going on, both 32 and 64 bit same results...4000 samples :?:

Xp32 13mins.30
Win7 64 14Min27
that scene's glossyness is way higher though...
it looks different than the others, is it the one from the new 2.2 demosuite, with pathtracing enabled ?

Radiance
I think not :( where do I grab it? (but it has pathtracing enabled)

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 9:29 am
by radiance
justix wrote:
radiance wrote:
justix wrote:Following amplitude video I had a go with my GTX470 MSI drivers Forceware 197.75 on WIN7 64Bit and I have the same result of my XP32 installation with 1 minute difference.
The odd thing is that I see that I got some sort of noise still going on, both 32 and 64 bit same results...4000 samples :?:

Xp32 13mins.30
Win7 64 14Min27
that scene's glossyness is way higher though...
it looks different than the others, is it the one from the new 2.2 demosuite, with pathtracing enabled ?

Radiance
I think not :( where do I grab it? (but it has pathtracing enabled)
on the demo download page, but you must change to pathtracing kernel.

Radiance

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 10:05 am
by justix
Much better now :)

11.46min

But amplitude video does have in his glossy settings a totally different values, specular is set to 0.2 and roughness at 120 (!!)
All times are UTC
Page 9 of 20

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited