Page 6 of 20

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:10 pm
by Proupin
http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... 30&start=0; here are the tests I did a while ago

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:17 pm
by grimm
Proupin wrote:I don't know if it's the OS because you didn't include it in your signature... but anyway, I found beta2 slighty slower than the previous version. I have done some benchmarks with the material sampler, and not only beta2 is much slower but with the same amount of samples it leaves much more noise behind... (and don't look the same : | )
It is in my sig, Fedora 12 is a Linux distro. ;) I should change my sig to reflect that.

Grimm

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:14 am
by Aaaaahole
My old 8800GTX.
0.82 MegaSamples/sec. Time for an upgrade.

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:36 pm
by Fueye
And my GTX260 - 1.42 Ms/s

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:21 pm
by buda
have any test with octane RC1 and GTX470/480 ?

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:35 pm
by pixym
You would better follow this thread:
http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... f=9&t=1286

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:58 pm
by buda
pixym wrote:You would better follow this thread:
http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... f=9&t=1286
I dont have acces to this thread :| can you post here some results? Thanks.

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:05 pm
by pixym
Some results:

480GTX: 2.8 Ms/s
280GTX@615mhz (240 cuda cores) 1GB: 2.07 Ms/s
GTX295: 1.47 Ms/s (one GPU only)
Nvidia 8800GT: 0,67Ms/s
GTX 285: 1,92 Ms/s

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:59 pm
by buda
pixym wrote:Some results:

480GTX: 2.8 Ms/s
280GTX@615mhz (240 cuda cores) 1GB: 2.07 Ms/s
GTX295: 1.47 Ms/s (one GPU only)
Nvidia 8800GT: 0,67Ms/s
GTX 285: 1,92 Ms/s
so RC1 dont full support fermi..

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:08 pm
by radiance
buda wrote:
pixym wrote:Some results:

480GTX: 2.8 Ms/s
280GTX@615mhz (240 cuda cores) 1GB: 2.07 Ms/s
GTX295: 1.47 Ms/s (one GPU only)
Nvidia 8800GT: 0,67Ms/s
GTX 285: 1,92 Ms/s
so RC1 dont full support fermi..
yes it does, it's got a fermi kernel in it.
we haven't fully explored the optimizations yet though.
it's a lot of work...

Radiance