Page 4 of 20

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:48 pm
by pixym
Your render is very weird :o
I have the same card as yours.

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:19 pm
by justix
pixym wrote:Your render is very weird :o
I have the same card as yours.
....maybe it's out of focus? :?

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:23 pm
by pixym
Smoothing issue I thing…
You have just to open the file then clic on the octane_benchmark.obj node in the Graph editor.

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:38 pm
by justix
pixym wrote:Smoothing issue I thing…
You have just to open the file then clic on the octane_benchmark.obj node in the Graph editor.
Ooops... 8-) Thanks

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:23 am
by RayTracey
DavidT wrote:It looks like my GTX 470 averaged about 2.06 megasamples/sec.
Only 112 of the available 448 cores are recognized by Octane, so if you're getting 2.05 Msamples/sec now, with the fix that would mean 8.20 MSamples/sec with all cores enabled :o . I hope I'm not overlooking something here. Crossing my fingers!

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:29 am
by radiance
daft_punk wrote:
DavidT wrote:It looks like my GTX 470 averaged about 2.06 megasamples/sec.
Only 112 of the available 448 cores are recognized by Octane, so if you're getting 2.05 Msamples/sec now, with the fix that would mean 8.20 MSamples/sec with all cores enabled :o . I hope I'm not overlooking something here. Crossing my fingers!
tomorrow i'm going to research why it says 112 cores.
it could be a bug in the way i display them and the card is actually using all of it's cores,
however i'm not sure.

i'll post more information tomorrow after my research :)

Radiance

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:30 am
by pixym
8.20 MSamples/sec... that would be enormous :o

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:08 am
by ttaberna
Some guy reported the same issue in his gtx480 in Arion that it only sees 120 cores
Hope it is fixed in octane for next release, cos -i'm planning buying this 480 beauties, although I am specting some more ram versions...maybe in near future i hot
Cheers

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:32 am
by justix
daft_punk wrote:
DavidT wrote:It looks like my GTX 470 averaged about 2.06 megasamples/sec.
Only 112 of the available 448 cores are recognized by Octane, so if you're getting 2.05 Msamples/sec now, with the fix that would mean 8.20 MSamples/sec with all cores enabled :o . I hope I'm not overlooking something here. Crossing my fingers!
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh....now I see why I could not understand how my poor 8800GT was actually giving me 2.05Msamples in another project...it has in facts 112 Cores...come on...unleash the Beast!...I'm next for a GTX470 (come ooooooon...hurry up lazy postman) :lol:

Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:12 am
by andrian
Here its mine, with GTX 260 Sonic overclocked edition and my second 8800 GTS 512.