Page 3 of 3
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:43 pm
by Sam
So is autodesk buying out refractive software?
/me slaps self with a trout for even thinking that thought
Really close, its Refractive Software buying Autodesk
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:58 pm
by Br1
mmm, "surpirse", love that word...
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:47 am
by andrian
I have a question, what is the benefit of Cuda 3.0 over 2.0? Some examples what you can't do in cuda 2.0 that you can do in 3.0 will be great.
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:43 am
by radiance
andrian wrote:I have a question, what is the benefit of Cuda 3.0 over 2.0? Some examples what you can't do in cuda 2.0 that you can do in 3.0 will be great.
you'll read this in the release notes of beta2.
saves me the time to type it up here, which i don't have...
Radiance
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:42 am
by andrian
radiance wrote:andrian wrote:I have a question, what is the benefit of Cuda 3.0 over 2.0? Some examples what you can't do in cuda 2.0 that you can do in 3.0 will be great.
you'll read this in the release notes of beta2.
saves me the time to type it up here, which i don't have...
Radiance
Quite enough.. I'll wait.
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 11:50 am
by metalliandy
Awesome job with the physical sun and sky system guys!
I cant wait
How much GPU memory does a 7million poly model actually take btw?
I imagine it must pretty much max out any of the current cards.
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:47 pm
by radiance
metalliandy wrote:Awesome job with the physical sun and sky system guys!
I cant wait
How much GPU memory does a 7million poly model actually take btw?
I imagine it must pretty much max out any of the current cards.
it took about 900mb.
Radiance
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:11 pm
by andrian
So if a person have GTX 260 with 1792 (or better with more memory) can get some decent renders with a LOTS of polygons - 14+ millions.
What about instancing, are they gonna improve that number ?
Example : GTX 260 896MB ram, I have building set up approximately 1,5 millions polygons, and I add greenery, all greenery pieces (trees. grass. flowers, etc.) will take like 5 million more, so we are on the threshold of 900 MB, but if I scatter instances lets say equivalent to 15 million more polygons what will happens then? We will still need only 900MB to render or ?
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 5:55 pm
by pedrojafet
Win 64 !!!
VERY GOOD NEWS!
Will be multi threading?
Re: 64bit, Mac OS X native and Cuda 3.0 confirmed for beta2
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:13 pm
by radiance
andrian wrote:So if a person have GTX 260 with 1792 (or better with more memory) can get some decent renders with a LOTS of polygons - 14+ millions.
What about instancing, are they gonna improve that number ?
Example : GTX 260 896MB ram, I have building set up approximately 1,5 millions polygons, and I add greenery, all greenery pieces (trees. grass. flowers, etc.) will take like 5 million more, so we are on the threshold of 900 MB, but if I scatter instances lets say equivalent to 15 million more polygons what will happens then? We will still need only 900MB to render or ?
with instances you can go as high as you want.
but they won't be supported yet in beta2.
Radiance