Page 3 of 3

Re: beeswax candle

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:34 pm
by jmfowler
sorry but I have to agree with Face about the smoke on your candle, there is too much detail in it for the size of the wick MEANING - the scale looks wrong.

It really seems like you have reacted very defensively on this point considering it was clearly a valid and constructive remark by Face.

Re: beeswax candle

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:58 pm
by MEC4D
and as you read we cleared it out already , so not see point of going back to it again .. and as I said the density of the smoke is to low and should be more diffuse
and scale have here nothing to do , as resealing the smoke will not change anything the details will be still there as it is post work and not a model .
I would have to do it again but I am not going to do that as I really no care about it as this image is not important , next time would be better .
I hope for once someone see what is good also and not focus only on negative point as no one in this gallery do everything perfect and accurate
beside Face have good intentions but explain the way that could be misunderstand for something different in his first comments .. but hey we know everything we want to know case is closed image landed in garbage .. what else to talk about that I already don't know about ..life go forward

P.S I still like Face nothing less ..