Page 13 of 20
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:45 pm
by buda
Zay wrote:Just got my Gainward 470 and did some tests.
Driver 197.75, Octane render 1.022, Vista 64bit
2,67 Megasamples.
O/C 3.33 Megasamples.
Cool )) How GPU temperature? ?
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:02 pm
by Zay
Below 70C. The fans was set manually to run at full speed. At default fan speed Octane would crash.
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:35 pm
by buda
Zay wrote:Below 70C. The fans was set manually to run at full speed. At default fan speed Octane would crash.
full speed? She makes a noise louder than a vacuum cleaner. )))))
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:09 pm
by crazyhorse666
portable 280m chipset seems very fast compared to desktop gtx470 how can this be right ?
Crazy
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:23 pm
by crazyhorse666
ok sorry i hit pathtracing and ran the benchmark again
0.57mpixs /sec !
my rig is a portable clevo i7 920 6gb with a nvidia gt280m chipset
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:51 am
by goranmax
HI all
I have tested my GTX 480 with water cooling
here is the result. still do not get it
is that good?
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:23 am
by buda
goranmax wrote:HI all
I have tested my GTX 480 with water cooling
here is the result. still do not get it
is that good?
Swith to pathtrase mode...
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:37 pm
by realTimer
Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB, factory OC @ 715MHz
This is the new GF104 with superscalar architecture, but only 224 of the 336 cores are used according to the device manager.
The result is 1.82 Megapixels/sec with Octane Render 1.022b
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:09 pm
by goranmax
buda wrote:goranmax wrote:
Swith to pathtrase mode...
but please tell me is that good or not
high numbers good ?...low numbers bad...or ???
Re: GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:35 pm
by realTimer
goranmax wrote:
but please tell me is that good or not
high numbers good ?...low numbers bad...or ???
High numbers are good
