GTX_1080 benchmark

Forums: GTX_1080 benchmark
Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby smicha » Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:05 pm

smicha Mon Nov 21, 2016 9:05 pm
BorisGoreta wrote:This benchmark and this whole thread is a bunch of BS !

It should be banned by admin immediately because it can lead innocent people into believing this benchmark gives accurate results when in fact it is completely broken !

Thanks smicha for pointing out how to make accurate comparisons by reading Msamples/s while using benchmark scenes in standalone.

Benchmark results told me that my 1080 is slower then 980Ti when in fact it was 23% faster.

Don't use this benchmark hack !


That is what I am trying to pass you guys all the time:

1. After Marcus (abstrax) Pascals work in Octane due to 7.5/8 cuda hybrid so Pascals are still not rendering at full speed. According to my statistical model
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=53959
Pascals shall be even faster (I'll refine the model soon)

2. 7x1080 OC to 2050 mhz on core and 5500mhz on memory scored above 1100 based on calculation of real scene rendered in PT mode - it was exactly 2.6x faster than 3 Titan X Maxwells that score 426.
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby Tutor » Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:20 am

Tutor Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:20 am
Smicha,

So, would it be your projection that the average Octane Bench (OB) score for similarly overclocked GTX 1080s would hover @ about 158 OB points (assuming that the current base OB GPU comparator stayed the same)?
Because I have 180+ GPU processers in 16 tweaked/multiOS systems - Character limit prevents detailed stats.
User avatar
Tutor
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Suburb of Birmingham, AL - Home of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby KonstantinosD » Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:04 am

KonstantinosD Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:04 am
I can say that this is how much they score now, but I bet it will be even more if and when the cuda 8 optimizations come to play..
2X Win10 PRO, Asus ROG Zenith Extreme Alpha, AMD 2990WX , 64GB ram, 2X 2080ti, all watercooled, custom loop.
KonstantinosD
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 9:18 am

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby jibbles10 » Tue Dec 27, 2016 7:47 pm

jibbles10 Tue Dec 27, 2016 7:47 pm
Maybe a little off topic, does a mixed GPU system work well with octane? For example a GTX 1080 and GTX 980 Ti?

(I'm currently using five GTX 980 Ti's and wondering if throwing in an extra 1080 in the mix will cause issues)
Last edited by jibbles10 on Tue Dec 27, 2016 8:27 pm, edited 3 times in total.
jibbles10
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:43 pm

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby uncia » Tue Dec 27, 2016 8:00 pm

uncia Tue Dec 27, 2016 8:00 pm
smicha wrote:Cause the benchmark is fake and not optimized well - get the same scene on Maxwells and compare it on Pascals in real PT rendering.


Cool story , bro ;)
uncia
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:02 pm
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby Matufia » Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:37 pm

Matufia Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:37 pm
Hi,
curiously i found out that if you run the "fake" benchmark, while also running some CPU burner like Prime95, you get to won a higher score.

Im Running 3 x 1070 FE, getting 394 points standard and 422 while running prime. That's like 10 points more per card. I assume this is score only based, and it's not actually going to benefit in rendering.

Im running the cards with +161 core // +223 mem

Cheers
Attachments
Screenshot (69).png
With Prime 95 Running
Screenshot (68).png
Without Prime 95.
http://www.matufia.tv

Main Build
i7 - 6700k // Evga z170 Classified K // 3 x 1070 Founders Edition // 32gb ram Kingston Fury 2133m:hz

Secondary Build
i7 - 4770k // Msi Gaming 5 // 1 x 960 2gb + 1 x 580 3gb // 32gb ram Gskill Sniper 1866mhz
Matufia
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 8:42 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby MildMustard » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:27 am

MildMustard Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:27 am
Don't bother with the hacky benchmark, figures are all over the place.
MildMustard
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:00 am

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby uncia » Thu Jan 26, 2017 1:58 pm

uncia Thu Jan 26, 2017 1:58 pm
MildMustard wrote:... the hacky benchmark...

Funny
uncia
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:02 pm
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby MildMustard » Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:06 pm

MildMustard Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:06 pm
No disrespect :)
MildMustard
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:00 am

Re: GTX_1080 benchmark

Postby nickmilitello » Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:06 pm

nickmilitello Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:06 pm
Any thoughts on why Im only getting 762 with 7 1080s? About 108 per card. Seems pretty weak.
Attachments
Screen Shot 2017-03-19 at 11.00.35 AM.png
nickmilitello
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:46 pm
PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests

Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:18 am [ UTC ]