Wave Optics Kernel

Forums: Wave Optics Kernel
A forum where development builds are posted for testing by the community.
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.

Re: Wave Optics Kernel

Postby nuno1980 » Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:04 pm

nuno1980 Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:04 pm
skientia wrote:That's prejudice and a bold assumption.

The discussion around caustics and PT is rather futile as Photon Tracing is available. It covers most end-user use cases in a relatively quite elegant and examplary way.
Ok but I continue to use PT kernel for highest realism of lighting for no any limitation as universal rays because PHT kernel and Wave Optics(?) can't render any light reflected and/or refracted at glossy and/or specular non-roughness material(s). PHT only(?) may not render any variable caustics, if the roughness of glossy ground has less than 0.3~0.4.

Can you understand this? ;)
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 NEW! <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 21" Sony E530 :D
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: Wave Optics Kernel

Postby skientia » Fri Apr 12, 2024 11:47 am

skientia Fri Apr 12, 2024 11:47 am
nuno1980 wrote:Ok but I continue to use PT kernel for highest realism of lighting for no any limitation as universal rays because PHT kernel and Wave Optics(?) can't render any light reflected and/or refracted at glossy and/or specular non-roughness material(s). PHT only(?) may not render any variable caustics, if the roughness of glossy ground has less than 0.3~0.4.

Can you understand this? ;)


Not in its current ambiguous and speculative state, especially without any concrete (white)papers and researches with cited sources.

The essential and simplified thought-process:
1. What is the current problem
> practical examples, not render-tests with absurd unconceivable settings that won't be viable in production (individual or studio)
2. What is/are the viable solutions
> (white)papers/researches, (practical) examples, and so forth. As conventionally done for years.

In any way, Octane caustics solutions — both in PT and Photon Tracing — are exemplary, efficient and versatile.
There little to nothing more needed at this point, besides the expected and typical constant improvements.
A free informative resource for everyone
SKIENTIA.CO/OCTANE
skientia
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:50 am

Re: Wave Optics Kernel

Postby nuno1980 » Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:48 pm

nuno1980 Sun Apr 14, 2024 9:48 pm
skientia wrote:In any way, Octane caustics solutions — both in PT and Photon Tracing — are exemplary, efficient and versatile.
There little to nothing more needed at this point, besides the expected and typical constant improvements.
I've knew this but I changed the kernel from PHT to PT since 2022 because the brightness issue for caustics only isn't fixed at PHT yet for 1 year ago -> check my «"Allow caustics": wrong brightness on caustics at Photon» topic. And, at PHT kernel, the variable caustics may be glitched on *glossy* ground with the roughness of less than 0.3~0.4. ;)
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 NEW! <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 21" Sony E530 :D
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm
Previous

Return to Development Build Releases


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Fri May 03, 2024 2:24 am [ UTC ]