DL vs PT, huge changes that shouldn't happen

Forums: DL vs PT, huge changes that shouldn't happen
Maxon Cinema 4D (Export script developed by abstrax, Integrated Plugin developed by aoktar)

Moderator: aoktar

DL vs PT, huge changes that shouldn't happen

Postby boxfx » Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:10 pm

boxfx Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:10 pm
Can anyone help me explain the following:

DTvsPT.jpg


When using Direct lighting, adding a soft, low power light to the background of my scene completely obliterates all the foreground lighting. When using Pathtracing, this does not happen.

C4D project attached
Octane 2020.2.5, GF3090, C4D 20
Attachments
light_issue.zip
(113.8 KiB) Downloaded 48 times
boxfx
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:13 am

Re: DL vs PT, huge changes that shouldn't happen

Postby boxfx » Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:16 pm

boxfx Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:16 pm
Increasing the sampling rate of the smaller white light to 100 fixes it, but why? I thought sampling rate was there to increase render quality for tiny bright lights which might otherwise get missed by the sampling algorithm?

My instinct is that its the large size of the blue light 'stealing' all the samples, but if you make the blue light smaller, but brighter, the same problem occurs
boxfx
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:13 am

Return to Maxon Cinema 4D


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests

Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:49 am [ UTC ]