Page 1 of 1
2x GTX 580 vs Quadro 4000
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:14 am
by NastyCircus
Hi, im new in Octane render.
i was wondering... what is better for me?
i'm motion graphic designer and i want to thy octane.
which graphic card is better for 3ds max, cinema 4D?
2x GTX 580 (1.5gb) or
Quadro 4000?
is better wait for kepler?

Re: 2x GTX 580 vs Quadro 4000
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:49 am
by JimStar
http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... =11&t=8033
EDIT: Sorry, I see that you have not access to that thread...

Repost of my post there:
GTX580 with 3GB. A lot faster than Quadro 4000 in CUDA and a lot more memory (important for big scenes). And cheaper.
But: very hot if sits in adjacent slots with another 580s... Quadro will be colder. In that moment I'm in process of setting a watercooling to my 4 x GTX580...
Additionally - you can read
THIS. Jeff Patton uses iRay, but the principles of CUDA-card choosing are the same for all GPU-renders.
Re: 2x GTX 580 vs Quadro 4000
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:52 pm
by NastyCircus
TNXs a lot for youre comment.
How can i measure the differences between gtx and quadro g. card?
i've seen a lot of comments about quadro performs better, because driver,clockspeed etc.
only one gtx 590 from asus, will perform better than quadro in speed ??
JimStar wrote:http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... =11&t=8033
EDIT: Sorry, I see that you have not access to that thread...

Repost of my post there:
GTX580 with 3GB. A lot faster than Quadro 4000 in CUDA and a lot more memory (important for big scenes). And cheaper.
But: very hot if sits in adjacent slots with another 580s... Quadro will be colder. In that moment I'm in process of setting a watercooling to my 4 x GTX580...
Additionally - you can read
THIS. Jeff Patton uses iRay, but the principles of CUDA-card choosing are the same for all GPU-renders.