OTOY Forums

Hi there,

When can we expect the OctaneBench update to Octane 3 and with Pascal support? I guess we all need to know in what cards to invest. Is there an approximate timeline for that?

Best,
Kuba

check this out =) viewtopic.php?f=9&t=56108

I've also have TitanX result - now it scores 160, but.. keep in mind code is not yet optimised =)

byMELT wrote:Hi there,

When can we expect the OctaneBench update to Octane 3 and with Pascal support? I guess we all need to know in what cards to invest. Is there an approximate timeline for that?

Best,
Kuba

We plan to add Pascal support to the 2.17 benchmark when the final CUDA 8 is out. OctaneBench based on version 3 will have to wait until OSL is done (i.e. some version after 3.10), to keep numbers comparable since the kernels are changing a lot at the moment.

Is 160 a good score? What would 780ti have? Thanks.

coilbook wrote:Is 160 a good score? What would 780ti have? Thanks.

780ti=103 points
you can look here for other cards https://render.otoy.com/octanebench/res ... ingleGPU=1

mark0spasic wrote:

coilbook wrote:Is 160 a good score? What would 780ti have? Thanks.

780ti=103 points
you can look here for other cards https://render.otoy.com/octanebench/res ... ingleGPU=1

Thanks!
I cannot believe new pascal titan is 160 and 2 x titan Z are just 173

coilbook wrote:

mark0spasic wrote:

coilbook wrote:Is 160 a good score? What would 780ti have? Thanks.

780ti=103 points
you can look here for other cards https://render.otoy.com/octanebench/res ... ingleGPU=1

Thanks!
I cannot believe new pascal titan is 160 and 2 x titan Z are just 173

That is one Titan Z (but it has two gpu on the one card.. sometimes that can be confusing)