Octane 2.0 = Less VRAM needed?
Posted: Fri May 02, 2014 4:42 am
Hi Paul (& everyone),
I am still shopping for the right video card (yeah, that old chestnut).
I loved the speed of the 590 I had, and never hit the memory limit (with the textures I was using) - although I came close quite a few times.
My work is pretty humble - but I am progressing; more detailed geom, & the extra textures with it.
Just wondering if the new stuff for Rhino in 2.0 (Instancing, region rendering, passes, etc) should help me continue to improve outputs while reducing VRAM requirements.. I'm pretty much settled on either a 690 or a 780Ti - pending your comments; affirmative or otherwise.
I also notice you use 1gb card, and there are other here that use 1gb cards and get great results...
I am still shopping for the right video card (yeah, that old chestnut).
I loved the speed of the 590 I had, and never hit the memory limit (with the textures I was using) - although I came close quite a few times.
My work is pretty humble - but I am progressing; more detailed geom, & the extra textures with it.
Just wondering if the new stuff for Rhino in 2.0 (Instancing, region rendering, passes, etc) should help me continue to improve outputs while reducing VRAM requirements.. I'm pretty much settled on either a 690 or a 780Ti - pending your comments; affirmative or otherwise.
I also notice you use 1gb card, and there are other here that use 1gb cards and get great results...