Performance question
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2013 3:07 pm
Hi,
I've been using 2 GTX 465 to render with octane
Each one has 352 cuda cores, So, I had a total of 704 cuda Cores
I finally upgraged my graphics cards, I replaced the two gtx 465 by 2 gtx 770
Each 770 has 1536 cuda cores, so now I have a total 3072 cuda cores
Shouldn't my render speeds be 4x faster now? I've read that octane scales linearly with the number of cuda cores (and the example of a gtx 690 with 3072 cores would be twice as fast as a 680 with 1536 cores)
I saved my render times from some scenes, and now I tested them with the new graphics cards, but I'm only getting half the speed (instead of 4 times less speed, and yes, I set the cuda options to use both graphics cards, and Sli is disabled)
Another thing I've noticed, the 2 gtx 465, are rendering faster than a single gtx 770 (I mean, if two gtx 465 are 704 cores in total, how could they be faster than the gtx 770 that has 1536 cores?)
I've been using 2 GTX 465 to render with octane
Each one has 352 cuda cores, So, I had a total of 704 cuda Cores
I finally upgraged my graphics cards, I replaced the two gtx 465 by 2 gtx 770
Each 770 has 1536 cuda cores, so now I have a total 3072 cuda cores
Shouldn't my render speeds be 4x faster now? I've read that octane scales linearly with the number of cuda cores (and the example of a gtx 690 with 3072 cores would be twice as fast as a 680 with 1536 cores)
I saved my render times from some scenes, and now I tested them with the new graphics cards, but I'm only getting half the speed (instead of 4 times less speed, and yes, I set the cuda options to use both graphics cards, and Sli is disabled)
Another thing I've noticed, the 2 gtx 465, are rendering faster than a single gtx 770 (I mean, if two gtx 465 are 704 cores in total, how could they be faster than the gtx 770 that has 1536 cores?)