GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:27 pm
OTOY Forums
Community Forums for OTOY Customers
https://render.otoy.com/forum/
GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Page 1 of 12
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:37 pm
Did he say twelve core ? This is never a quadro fx octane output.
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:57 pm
Hmmm... They (Modo) really have a great application...
but I think Octane really turn heads and They need hold the table and react
Seeing the comparison made with Octane beta Pathtracing,
I cross the fingers for 2.3 version coming.
but I think Octane really turn heads and They need hold the table and react
Seeing the comparison made with Octane beta Pathtracing,
I cross the fingers for 2.3 version coming.
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:25 pm
My opinion to the video:
Talking never rendered a photoreal picture
Talking never rendered a photoreal picture
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:41 pm
Doesn't work for me at the moment...might me Chrome, or something...
anyway, why do they bother making this
...
anyway, why do they bother making this
...Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 4:56 pm
They must have a special version of octane render: If you look to the two pictures with the star trekfigures they are testing area lights ?
Hey man Octnae has no area lights, so i doubt they used octane pictures. It looks like they have used modo pictures with extra postpro noise!
dirty propaganda tricks
Hey man Octnae has no area lights, so i doubt they used octane pictures. It looks like they have used modo pictures with extra postpro noise!
dirty propaganda tricks
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:11 pm
you can download the quicktime file.GeorgoSK wrote:Doesn't work for me at the moment...might me Chrome, or something...
anyway, why do they bother making this
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:12 pm
I wonder if that was a truly fair comparison without someone from Refractive software being there with
a machine of their own.
The whole thing comes off as a larger older company Vers the small new upstart, mixed with a touch of condescension .
a machine of their own.
The whole thing comes off as a larger older company Vers the small new upstart, mixed with a touch of condescension .
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:41 pm
It's not like you can't try it yourself. The scene with the spheres is easy enough to replicate.
The guy came across as pretty honest to me. Certainly makes you think.
Even doubling the modo render times (because he was on a twelve core) it doesn't seem like it's any slower than Octane. Let alone 10x slower. Maybe radiance can chime in on this.
The guy came across as pretty honest to me. Certainly makes you think.
Even doubling the modo render times (because he was on a twelve core) it doesn't seem like it's any slower than Octane. Let alone 10x slower. Maybe radiance can chime in on this.
Re: GPU rendering is not the magic bullet it was promised to be
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:47 pm
I just think that this kind of videos have legal ramifications. That is why there's no comment from any octane team.
Not sure how laws in the US are but in other countries you can't make such comparisons and not make the competitions anonymous.
Modo render is good indeed for general purpose. But vray is THE best. Hehe.
Not sure how laws in the US are but in other countries you can't make such comparisons and not make the competitions anonymous.
Modo render is good indeed for general purpose. But vray is THE best. Hehe.