OTOY Forums

I would argue the same only more strongly. We need Octane to be solid and dependable and be able to replicate a lot of the stuff C4D can do natively before throwing in novelties like volume rendering.

Don't get me wrong, TFD support would be amazing - but I'm not sure that's what a lot of people need right now.

Weezer wrote:I would argue the same only more strongly. We need Octane to be solid and dependable and be able to replicate a lot of the stuff C4D can do natively before throwing in novelties like volume rendering.

Don't get me wrong, TFD support would be amazing - but I'm not sure that's what a lot of people need right now.

yes i support that…
everyone wants the fancy stuff, but do they really use it professionally? probably 2% of them.

aoktar wrote:i'm doing some tests on particle engine with motion blur on xparticles. This is a quick test with colored emission. This is not good quality, but can give some opinions about possibilities

[vimeo]http://www.vimeo.com/95801318[/vimeo]

Quick question. Will it be possible to use the hair shader on xparticles or xparticles trails in octane 2.0?

ten

a sample for hair rendering.
155samples, 9 sec. render time with AO and a arealight. 10-11 sec. is for hair generation time.
[vimeo]http://www.vimeo.com/96093057[/vimeo]

Yes yes yes!!!!
Great to see the fast progres

Wonderful Ahmet. It is really great to see day by day improvements.
Thank you.

This just keeps getting better and better! How long until a beta release do you think? (Even one that's flaky just so we can play with it?)

Weezer wrote:This just keeps getting better and better! How long until a beta release do you think? (Even one that's flaky just so we can play with it?)

plugin is near to beta release. There is some uncompleted things, but i can complete in a beta period. But we have to wait SDK for fixing and completing for some stuff.

This is just amazing. Thank you for you hard work

A hardcore test with preset scene of Cinema 4D. Everything is made with hair objects.