Page 8 of 10
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:13 pm
by justix
shikakka wrote:Tested the benchmark scene with the GTX 670 (Gigabyte GV-N670OC-2GD, factory overclocked)today .
I tested with Octane 2.58c (Kepler test build) and Nvidia 301.42 drivers; the test system had a Core i7 3770 3.4GHz, and 32GB RAM at 1600MHz.
The results:
DirectLighting 01:04 minutes 9.35 Ms/sec
Pathtracing 03:38 minutes 2.63 Ms/sec
PMC 04:41 minutes 2.05 Ms/sec
You mean the Octane Benchamark by Legrenzi? 16000s/p? DL completed in 1:04 Minutes? well that is WAY fast off my GTX470..OK my Rig is a bit dated but we are talking GPU cores and my GTX470 | cCuda Driver 4.20 Cuda Runtime 4.0 Direct Light complete the render in 15 minutes..something wrong?
edit: maybe I was stupid? benchmark could be the one posted here at 1000s/p? in that case is about a minute and 3.30 PT
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:02 am
by marcio_max
roeland wrote:shikakka wrote:Tested the benchmark scene with the GTX 670 (Gigabyte GV-N670OC-2GD, factory overclocked)today .
I tested with Octane 2.58c (Kepler test build) and Nvidia 301.42 drivers; the test system had a Core i7 3770 3.4GHz, and 32GB RAM at 1600MHz.
The results:
DirectLighting 01:04 minutes 9.35 Ms/sec
Pathtracing 03:38 minutes 2.63 Ms/sec
PMC 04:41 minutes 2.05 Ms/sec
These are the numbers for a GTX680 (from EVGA, not overclocked) with NVIDIA driver 302.59.
Benchmark trench, all kernels have alpha shadows switched off.
DirectLighting: ∙ 9.18 Ms/sec
Pathtracing: ∙ ∙ ∙ 2.67 Ms/sec
PMC: ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ 2.02 Ms/sec
What is the clock speed on your GTX 670?
--
Roeland
Same result in my GTX 470
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:03 pm
by adrencg
I have the 580, so will the 590 double my render speed?
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:10 am
by Phantom107
Great topic, thanks for the hard work!
I was looking for another GPU for the desktop, and this really helped comparing the ones within budget. I ended up with a 2nd hand GTX570 for just 180 euros. Which is a steal for a student like me!
On a side note, I am constantly amazed at the insane PCs you guys have. Haven't seen it like that anywhere else.
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:56 am
by petergazo
Phantom107 wrote:Great topic, thanks for the hard work!
I was looking for another GPU for the desktop, and this really helped comparing the ones within budget. I ended up with a 2nd hand GTX570 for just 180 euros. Which is a steal for a student like me!
I took a secondhand gtx580 1.5GB for 200 euros
Now waiting for another bargain like that.
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:26 pm
by renmaxhb
Who tested gtx480 with 512sp?
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:41 pm
by gueoct
With my GTX 580 3GB, the benchmark scene renders:
3,65 Ms/sec. Not the 4,41 as described at the beginnig of this thread...
How can that be ????
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:03 am
by t_3
gueoct wrote:With my GTX 580 3GB, the benchmark scene renders:
3,65 Ms/sec. Not the 4,41 as described at the beginnig of this thread...
How can that be ????
the chart reads
4.14, apart from that you also need to read the footnotes (there's a reason, why exactly that line is grayed out
), and take into consideration, that the chart is over a year old, done with octane 2.48b.
since i now own 580s, i can tell you that - at standard clock, but with the latest nvida driver (what can make a difference) - 2.48b renders this scene with 4.02ms/sec, whereas 2.59 does 3.98ms/sec. so your 3.65ms/sec are not that much off, but imo it should be faster...
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:58 pm
by smicha
Octane Render works about 5% faster under newest nVidia driver 306.23. Do you also have such speed up?
Re: Performance comparsion of various GTX cards (including o
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:01 pm
by t_3
smicha wrote:Octane Render works about 5% faster under newest nVidia driver 306.23. Do you also have such speed up?
on what card?!?
funny enough, when i posted the above, i used 2.59 + 301.42 and had around 4ms/s;
after installing the new driver i only had ~3.85ms/s - switching back to 301.42 - still 3.85ms/s
maybe, that is the way how nvida is going to make the 6xx cards faster than the 5xx ones
hey, i want my 0.15ms/s back... rebooting...