Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:37 am
by y81r
is something broken with VertexMap?
Same result with Mix and Blend Mat
Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 9:39 am
by y81r
It should like this
Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 8:35 am
by stefano-dear
Hi,
I did some tests also with network render but version 4 seems slower than version 3.08.5.
Except this the denoiser works very well also for animations!
Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 1:59 pm
by Nando_The_Fly_Design
Hello Aoktar.
Is there any way for the response camera to show up in the denoised pass?
(In Camera imager > response)
Thank you.
Alpha problem ? Version 4.0-RC5
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:52 pm
by AlvaroLetelier
Hi there.
Using Turbulence FD I have a problem when rendering with alpha. Check pic.
Cheers.
Out of Memory problem Version 4.0-RC5
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2018 7:08 pm
by AlvaroLetelier
Hi there.
I'm not using all my memory on the cards but somehow the render stops because of out of memory?
Please check pic.
Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 3:35 pm
by caexsar
Hi to all,
i post a request and some doubts I have about the Denoiser and multipass management.
I wondered if it's possible to have the following workflows: For stills 1.) from active LV (Denoiser and postfx activated in Octane Camera tag) with locked resolution (Ex 1080x1080) -> while LV is rendering for example the sample XXXX/4096 samples -> start / continue the render in PV without losing the samples already rendered in LV (with PV pre-setup done like this: 1080x1080 img type, name and location). No multipass, only a single image without noise and with postfx (from camera tag). 2.) export directly to PV a single denoised image + the postfx from the tag camera (LUT bloom, glare etc). No multipass. 3.) export directly to PV a single denoised image + the postfx from the tag camera (LUT bloom, glare etc). + multipass for z-depth one more image.
For video
Keep in mind that I'm thinking about this after seeing this tutorial
by Stuz0R / Stuart Lippincott
When I want to do compositing using the z-depth to add fog.
Can I do this? A) export to PV the first block / sequence of images denoised beauty + the postfx from the camera tag (LUT bloom, glare etc). + second block / sequence of multipass images for z-depth?
Or better do this (as he shows in the tuto)? B) export a single block / sequence of exr with denoised beauty + postfx + z-depth
My current thoughts:
- if point A is possible and I need to do compositing only with the z-depth for fog, then I choose this workflow -> right?
- is workflow B only necessary if I want to work in compositing with denoised beauty, postfx and z-depth with each of them separately? what could be the advantages? z-dept for fog and smoke to add depth and then? denoised beauty separated from postfx (bloom, glare tec) for ... what?
Sorry in advice for my fragmented knowledge of C4D, Octane and english language.
Take the opportunity to congratulate and give a big thanks to Aoktar for all the incredible work done so far, I recently exported a video of a really heavy scene for my hardware setup at incredible speed!
Cheers ... Cesare
Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 4:43 pm
by frankmci
y81r wrote:is something broken with VertexMap?
Same result with Mix and Blend Mat
When I see preview icons like that in the node editor, I quickly save and quit. I think it may be a symptom of corrupted texture memory on the GPU. It may just be coincidence that it happened to you with a vertex map, as I see the same kind of thing in other channels, too.
Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 5:31 pm
by aoktar
y81r wrote:is something broken with VertexMap?
Same result with Mix and Blend Mat
No! Have you tried on different setups?
Re: Version 4.0-RC5 (Latest release candidate) 29.09.2018
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:48 pm
by divasoft
caexsar wrote:Hi to all,
i post a request and some doubts I have about the Denoiser and multipass management.
I wondered if it's possible to have the following workflows:
Cheers ... Cesare
I asked Aoktar to do this many times. Apparently waiting for this is meaningless.