OTOY Forums

Hey glimpse,

Can we state that the TitanZ is in still king o ver the 108Ti,
and that performance might be difference from depending on scenes... with sometimes just little difference to even +15% for TZ.
In the official OctaneBench the TitanZ scores average 179... then I would estimate the 1080Ti around 170?

I wonder though how watercooled TitanZ and watercooled 1080Ti will compare

greetz,

4 x 1080Ti for 712 and divide that by 4 = 178 per 1080Ti, roughly...

slimer wrote:4 x 1080Ti for 712 and divide that by 4 = 178 per 1080Ti, roughly...

Quad.... Nice!!!
So that is on air and some overclocking, right?
What temps do they run?... And fanspeed?...can you show photograph of the setup?... would love to see that.
Cheers,

rappet wrote:

slimer wrote:4 x 1080Ti for 712 and divide that by 4 = 178 per 1080Ti, roughly...

Quad.... Nice!!!
So that is on air and some overclocking, right?
What temps do they run?... And fanspeed?...can you show photograph of the setup?... would love to see that.
Cheers,

I am sorry, I did not state that this setup is overclocked a little running at 1960MHz.

Air cooled, turn the fan up at 75% and the max temperature is 70C for continuous Octane rendering. It could be lower if you crank the fan up.

I have run this setup for 5 days straight and no problem at all. I was afraid at the beginning that the cards are so close to each other but for Founder Edition is fine because the air intake is from the front of the cards.

Just be careful when you try to install the 4th card, there usually are connectors (USB, HDaudio, .....) at the edge and it takes a while to install.

Also, don't put any SLI bridge on. I put a dual SLI High-Bandwidth bridge on the first two cards and somehow the load distribution is not perfect. Although it works (all 4 GPU).

The highest temperature are the first two cards, the last two are in 50-60 something.

My Mobo is the Asus Rampage Extreme V and the CPU is i7-5960X

Here's a picture for you.

Slimer, thnx for sharing.. Good to see and hear that your quad is running fine sticking them together.
Probably I will try stuffing 1080ti and maxwell Titan Black together and see if they work fine too.

rappet wrote:Slimer, thnx for sharing.. Good to see and hear that your quad is running fine sticking them together.
Probably I will try stuffing 1080ti and maxwell Titan Black together and see if they work fine too.

Tell us what happens!

slimer wrote:

rappet wrote:Slimer, thnx for sharing.. Good to see and hear that your quad is running fine sticking them together.
Probably I will try stuffing 1080ti and maxwell Titan Black together and see if they work fine too.

Tell us what happens!

running 1080Ti + TitanBlack =) no issues so far.

One thing I noticed: probably because of old CPU, the result itself is not as high as other get. ~170 is not bad out of the box, but I've seen ~190 (without tweaks).

If You want to get more, try to load one CPU core, so it would stay busy keeping higher frequency - that helps to keep higher result as Single core from CPU keeps pushing information faster. For instance CPU that I have get's in a reduced clock speeds that are 1,6 instead of 4,4 & that has an effect on output result from OctaneBench.

I thought CPU speed doesn't matter that much. Guess I am wrong. Interesting to know though.

rappet wrote:Hey glimpse,

Can we state that the TitanZ is in still king o ver the 108Ti,
and that performance might be difference from depending on scenes... with sometimes just little difference to even +15% for TZ.
In the official OctaneBench the TitanZ scores average 179... then I would estimate the 1080Ti around 170?

I wonder though how watercooled TitanZ and watercooled 1080Ti will compare :o

greetz,

I'm not sure Z is still a king. Trying to understand why performance is much more influenced by CPU in v3. As mentioned prior..OctaneBench result could differ based on whether Your CPU is doing something or is it 'sleeping' (with reduced clock speeds). OC matter a lot as well.

if I happen to get 170+ out of the box & 200+ with OC on air, while some others 190+ out of the box, without any OC.. 'm really curious where it would go under water. TitanX (older Pascal card, not the new one) with waterblocks reach close to 220 & 1080Ti seems to have faster memory.. - waiting for waterblocks to test. This will be interesting!

slimer wrote:I thought CPU speed doesn't matter that much. Guess I am wrong. Interesting to know though. :D

Single core performance maters ;) & yeah, the other day pushed CPU from 4.2 to 4.4. & it made a difference.. small, but still..