Page 54 of 62
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:19 pm
by Seekerfinder
smicha wrote:I set path term power to 1 - this may be the reason.
Sneaky hobbits... so you did. I was looking at the CR only. When you have a moment I would appreciate seeing your path term power 0 score for a more accurate comparison.
Cheers,
Seeker
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:45 pm
by smicha
Default value of path term power is 0.3 (I assume Bulwerk had this value). Then the score is 41.6 ms/s.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 9:02 pm
by Seekerfinder
smicha wrote:Default value of path term power is 0.3 (I assume Bulwerk had this value). Then the score is 41.6 ms/s.
That makes much more sense. Thanks Smicha.
Seeker
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:49 pm
by Bulwerk
Its like a GPU arms race here! I love it! Gotta say thanks to Smicha and Glimpse for all the input during the research phase of this build.
Also have to thank the guys at Maingear that built this monster and made sure it would not burn its self out. If you want to know more about the build look here
http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=43992
4x TitanZ Overclocked on water.
Core ~1245 Mhz
Mem~ 1502 Mhz
DIrectlight
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1
~392 Ms/s
Pathtracing
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1
~186 Ms/s
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:58 pm
by smicha
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:18 pm
by rappet
Aaaaarrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh ! That is outerspace joy!
btw: That is +63% compared AC when looking at one Z... and WC can have 4 of those arrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh !
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:42 pm
by smicha
rappet wrote:Aaaaarrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh ! That is outerspace joy!
btw: That is +63% compared AC when looking at one Z... and WC can have 4 of those arrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh !
45-50% is what watercooling gives on 4 cards compared to aircooling (not talking about raisers with more space between cards).
I can clock my strix to 1300mhz and 7000 on memory which gives about 45%-60% speedup depending on aircooled settings. And this is done under 40C on gpus. Once you get watercooled machine you'll never want to go to AC

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:27 pm
by Tutor
1x TitanZ Overclocked on air.
Core ~(from 705 MHz originally to) 930 MHz
Mem ~3506 MHz
Direct Lighting
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1
~81.59 Ms/s
Path Tracing
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1
~39.16 Ms/s
One Titan Z on Air [However, this is just the beginning - ultimately looking for more than 7 times these scores via WolfPackAlphaCanisLupus1 where all processors - both GPU processors (14) and CPUs (2) - will be swimming in cold water.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:11 am
by grimm
2.16 has improved the GTX980's times a bit. All test have CR at 1 and PTP at 1 respectively.
DL - about 33 Ms/sec
PT - about 15.5 Ms/sec
PMC - about 5.06 Ms/sec
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2014 7:27 am
by Tutor
7xGTX780TI - no overclocking - air cooled
DL - 168.47 Ms/sec
PT - 136.86 Ms/sec
PathTerm = 1 and Coherent Ratio = 1.