Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 10:40 pm
I'm new to this kind of rendering and I want to ask, what would do to get rid of the lines besides post-processing? Render longer?
OTOY Forums
Community Forums for OTOY Customers
https://render.otoy.com/forum/
My little Octane Benchmark
Page 5 of 6
Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 10:47 pm
What do you mean? What lines?
Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:10 pm
hi, I gathered all this data up into a spreadsheet - see http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... =21&t=3189
Quadro 4000
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:10 pm
Quadro 4000
1.18 MS
2.25 FPS
Using the settings from the video.
Waiting for a 2GB GTX 460 (besides the Palit), but nobody has them for sale.
1.18 MS
2.25 FPS
Using the settings from the video.
Waiting for a 2GB GTX 460 (besides the Palit), but nobody has them for sale.
@cecofuli
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:46 pm
How much time did it take with Vray with the same hardware configuration? More or less? And final quality?
Thank you
Thank you
Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:06 pm
Gainward GTX460 2gb GS. Clocks= GPU:800, RAM:2000
Cheers,
n1k
Cheers,
n1k
Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:29 pm
Meh, I get to the same no. of samples on the same graphic card with 2.3v5 in 01:33 = 12% of differencen1k wrote:Gainward GTX460 2gb GS. Clocks= GPU:800, RAM:2000
Cheers,
n1k
That's a disappointing speed increase
and probably only due to optimizations.So, I'm still not getting it; is Octane in 2.4 with cuda 3.2 using all the cores or not?!
Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:37 pm
Well, beats me 
I think only one of the developers can answer that question. We can just guess 
heheh
P.S. I added bench result with alphashadows turned off.
Cheers,
n1k
I think only one of the developers can answer that question. We can just guess heheh P.S. I added bench result with alphashadows turned off.
Cheers,
n1k
Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:47 am
I'm not sure myself, although the cuda driver now returns the correct number of cores in use,
the fact that using a GPU performance analysis tool both 3.2 and 3.0 builds use the same percentage of GPU usage,
it looks like 3.0 was using everything too, however i can't say for sure, as i can only see what the performance tools tell me...
On the other hand, the 3.2 builds should be using the GPUs to the maximum extent.
Radiance
the fact that using a GPU performance analysis tool both 3.2 and 3.0 builds use the same percentage of GPU usage,
it looks like 3.0 was using everything too, however i can't say for sure, as i can only see what the performance tools tell me...
On the other hand, the 3.2 builds should be using the GPUs to the maximum extent.
Radiance
Re: My little Octane Benchmark
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:41 pm
Ok tried the benchmark scene:
My specs:
AMD 1055T with 3 cores switched on and OC at 3.5GHZ
2GB ram
Gigabyte GTX460 1MB
Octane V2.42 (Latest)
Win7 64bit
Nvidia Drivers 266.58
time 3 mins 20secs to complete 4000 samples. GPU Usage only 85% - so no point in running it again with an overclock on the card.
Me thinks you may need a new heavy duty test scene and every one running the new test to compare with.
something that maxes the cards out.
My specs:
AMD 1055T with 3 cores switched on and OC at 3.5GHZ
2GB ram
Gigabyte GTX460 1MB
Octane V2.42 (Latest)
Win7 64bit
Nvidia Drivers 266.58
time 3 mins 20secs to complete 4000 samples. GPU Usage only 85% - so no point in running it again with an overclock on the card.
Me thinks you may need a new heavy duty test scene and every one running the new test to compare with.
something that maxes the cards out.