Page 4 of 4

Re: murcielago animation

Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:42 pm
by salvation
ok i uploaded to mediafire..
http://www.mediafire.com/?yi3wzmoylyw

its not noiseless.. but i think it could be better with some tweak of settings..
BTW.. i think the result would be also better if you could use for each image a different random seed..
(static noise is bad for temporal filtering)

Re: murcielago animation

Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:47 pm
by radiance
Hey,

It's never good to reencode off a badly compressed video (my source i posted).
but i'll try the technique you suggest the next time i compress a test video of another new feature (which i'll be doing tomorrow morning! :)

Radiance

Re: murcielago animation

Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:51 pm
by salvation
you are fast *lol*.. sorry i edited just my post...
i know its not a perfect solution.. but i think its a good idee to do a postprocess