OTOY Forums

The score with version 1.16 is 5.94
With +100 Mhz overclocking it's 6.25
With +100 Mhz and +200 Mhz to memory the score is 6.45

That is a nice improvement.

Edit: I ran the benchmark a bit longer with +100 Mhz to baseclock and +200Mhz to memory and the score dropped to 6.3. However the card only got to 80c and fanspeed to 50% and both values stayed there. I did not touch the voltage or power target. When I get a better OC software I might test with higher values. Baseclock OC seems to have a bigger impact than memory.

Edit2: Got EVGA precision for overclocking. I'm now running the card with:
101% power target
84c temp target
GPU clock offset +170Mhz

After 10 minutes I'm getting a stable 6.46 score. temp is at 80c and fan speed is at 55%. My case fans are on a setting 4 out of 6. It's not noisy and seems very stable.

Question for gtx 780, how many textures rgb support because gtx 580 support 64 RGB 3dmax

Hello,

benchmark with 4 x gtx690 watter cooled: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPCA34EVoIw

Cheers,
Karlo

snake12 wrote:Question for gtx 780, how many textures rgb support because gtx 580 support 64 RGB 3dmax

Titan - 224
GTX 780 - 192
GTX 680 - 128
GTX 580 - 64

*not available yet
*Titan ULTRA - 256 or 240(?)
*Titan LE - 208

The 780 shares same board design as the Titan, so TITAN waterblocks are compatible with 780's

Octopot wrote:

snake12 wrote:Question for gtx 780, how many textures rgb support because gtx 580 support 64 RGB 3dmax

Titan - 224
GTX 780 - 192
GTX 680 - 128
GTX 580 - 64

*not available yet
*Titan ULTRA - 256 or 240(?)
*Titan LE - 208

The 780 shares same board design as the Titan, so TITAN waterblocks are compatible with 780's

so ,is GTX780 working correct in Octane ?

OK, so here we go:

EVGA GTX780
Nvidia reference build
overclocked to +140Mhz GPU +370Mhz Mem
score ~6.3



Yeah...

::mate::

Got something new to play with.
Now switched majority of production rendering from Vray to Octane.
Thats why I needed a bigger card with more Vram.

Asus Nvidia GTX Titan

Octane Benchmark with 1.16:
DL 25 Ms/Sec
PT 7,2 Ms /Sec
PMC 5,42 Ms/Sec

Its about 2.5 X faster then my old Asus Nvidia GTX 570
And of course has a lot more Vram!

Cheers,
Silverwing

Hi guys,

About Titan I have seen some different results and ofcourse the differences are a little due to overclocking,
but the biggest difference is in watercooling, right?
Some results are i.e. 6.78 and 6.4 and other results are i.e. 8.13 and 8.25
Can I say that appr. the watercooling gives about 25% more speed (8.2/6.6=1.24)?

When I bought my machine about a year ago the cost of watercooling was about 1K,
but I went for aircooling instead.
In near future I might be needing a new machine and when having 4 titans I think the price will be about 7 or 7,5K.
Investing watercooling will be worth because for 15% more cost I will have 25% more speed.

Do you agree on this or am I missing something? Some results is not mentioned the WC or AC, but my main question is am I right about the 8.2/6.6 ratio in all your results with the Titan?

greetz,

Thats not exactly done like that.
The titan could be overclocked and gain 25% whenever with AC or WC. the fact is with WC you will maintain this 25% all the time (my T° is always below 60°C). for AC, when T°C reach 80°C, the OC will be reduced automatically.
the question is when you have 2 or more titans (I have 3), the heat comes very fast ! (with 3 on AC, I cannot maintain 25% more than 5 min, with fan spinup very fast too --> very noisy when fans reach over 70%)
The WC cost me only 500€ (one ALL in One kit swiftech for the CPU and additional rad for the GPU) and + 300€ for Titan Waterblocks.
You could only WC the GPU and stay in AC for CPU.

Just took the plunge and bought a Titan (need the extra ram for a project I've doing). Looking forward to seeing the speed difference.