Page 27 of 62
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 9:10 am
by itou31
the PSU is enough for the whole system : it's a 1600W. for the
[email protected] and 3 titans, only need 1100W full load (CPU + GPU).
Else, you can add another PSU in parallel. I did it when I only have a 900W.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 11:14 am
by mauricesteenbergen
itou31 wrote:@smicha
Soory I have not mentioned that the PC is NOT in my room, it's is remotly controled and it is in the garage where the temperature is about 18°C
Hi,
What remote option are you using? Very interested in this.
How about building a PC in a freezer
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 5:33 pm
by itou31
mauricesteenbergen wrote:itou31 wrote:@smicha
Soory I have not mentioned that the PC is NOT in my room, it's is remotly controled and it is in the garage where the temperature is about 18°C
Hi,
What remote option are you using? Very interested in this.
How about building a PC in a freezer
I use RADMIN remote desktop with octane standalone or 3dsmax plugin. The client is just a small NUC with a big screen.
I have also use windows remote desktop for DAZ plugin because of pb with opengl.
In a freezer ? not a good idea !(humidity !!)
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 7:22 am
by smicha
itou31 wrote:
I use RADMIN remote desktop...
There is also free (for non-commercials)
http://www.teamviewer.com/en/download/windows.aspx
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 2:52 pm
by itou31
yes I know and tested it, but RADMIN is a lot faster when use it on LAN. The only problem with most of remote desktop software, is that DAZ (ie octane for daz) cannot be used fully. When I work with DAZ, I should use windows remote desktop v6 and not the metro windows 8 version.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 4:14 pm
by cfrank78
I simply made a 3 inch hole in my wall with a blend. Took extra long cable and installed the computer into another room! 8 X USB 3.0 hub for mouse, 3d mouse and other USB devices - done!
Works great since 3 Years now. And i have the "most silent" pc you can get!
Kind regards Chris!
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:40 pm
by smicha
780 seems to be close to titan (in terms of performance)
http://youtu.be/3gB9-eIPLzM
If 790 comes out 4x790 will be the beast (3gb of vram though)
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 2:46 pm
by itou31
Titan is about +15% performance over 780 for octane.
but the price is +50%
So I think that 780 is the best choice if 3Gb is enough.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gef ... 16-26.html
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 5:53 pm
by MDK
First test with GTX 780
score 4.93
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/277 ... octane.jpg
No overclocking done. I understand that It's possible to OC this card a bit without making it too loud or hot. As you can see the fanspeed didn't get very high.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 7:16 pm
by itou31
you should play with the 1.16, it's faster !
and yes, the 780 is fast and "cheap". you should try some overclocking....
