Page 22 of 62
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:14 pm
by whersmy
price performance wise: 4x 590s get about 30ms, and cost about 400 euros a peace, that`s 1600,-.
ofcourse there are other advantages, vram, power usage, but budget designers will have to choose i think
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 4:46 pm
by manalokos
EVGA Geforce TITAN superclocked- Octane 1.11 - Pathtracing: 6.78 Ms/sec.
NVIDIA Geforce GTX 590 Octane 1.11 - Pathtracing: 6.76 Ms/sec.
Quite crappy considering it costs more than twice the price...
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:03 pm
by Refracty
For me one Titan would be cool enough. Just in case if there are heavy scenes flying in. But I can wait a bit until the price of a Titan drops to 70 percent in a couple of months
So what comes after the Titan ladys and gentleman?
What is really crazy is the rising of VRam of gaming cards during the last 2 years.
Before, the VRam was always up to 2 GB. No big changes for multiple years.
Then there was the 580 with 3GB followed by the 680 with for and the Titan with 6GB.
That sets a new standart for VRam consumption.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:19 pm
by Zay
manalokos wrote:EVGA Geforce TITAN superclocked- Octane 1.11 - Pathtracing: 6.78 Ms/sec.
NVIDIA Geforce GTX 590 Octane 1.11 - Pathtracing: 6.76 Ms/sec.
Quite crappy considering it costs more than twice the price...
At least you have more RAM
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:45 pm
by jagger
Here 2x evga superclocked titan. Octane 1.11:
PT: 12.80
PMC: 9.88
DL: 44.55
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:29 am
by bepeg4d
it would be nice to see the score of the octane-cloud with the benchmark scene
ciao beppe
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:01 am
by manalokos
Question: why do you post the performance of the cards summed together?
It makes everything more confusing, and there is loss of information.
I beleive one should post the performance of each individual card, they should add up to the correct value, when summed all together.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:44 am
by ron908
1.10 vs. 1.11
GTX 680 + GTX Titan, both slightly OC
1.10:
DL: 32.81
PT: 8.30
PMC: 7.11
1.11:
DL: 38.11
PT: 9.17
PMC: 7.62
Especially in the DL kernel that's a massive jump...
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:00 pm
by Zay
Gainward GTX Titan oc (Core +200, mem +300). Octane 1.11
Pathtracing: 7.78Ms/s (no shadows).
Almost twice as fast as my oc GTX580 (3.96Ms/s).
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:33 pm
by Jan
GeForce GTX 670 4GB (GV-N670OC-4GD) no extra OC. Octane 1.11
PT: 3.42
PMC: 2.86
DL: 13.68