Page 3 of 3
Re: some renders for fun
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 3:25 pm
by pepasystem
Yes, thanks for info

Re: some renders for fun
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 3:56 pm
by pepasystem
pmc 98000 s/p 10h50m gtx 780Ti + 980
at the begining:
gtx 780Ti 2.1 s/s
gtx 980 1.8 s/s
later stable 5.1 s/s for both
Re: some renders for fun
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 10:32 pm
by nuno1980
pepasystem wrote:pmc 98000 s/p 10h50m gtx 780Ti + 980
at the begining:
gtx 780Ti 2.1 s/s
gtx 980 1.8 s/s
later stable 5.1 s/s for both
I like too it!!

But should enable disperison with 0.003 or 0.004 for rings' glass because
the real life may not have any specular material (glass, water...) with
non-dispersion.
2.1 s/s on GTX 780Ti is tooooo slow!? But yes 2.1
MS/s very likely.
But... I'm worried because Maxwell card (GeForce 900) may be worse optimized than Kepler in 2nd time after Fermi.

Re: some renders for fun
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:01 am
by pepasystem
Thanks for reply.
It look way better with dispersions. Thx.
Ofcoz, 2.1M s/s

Re: some renders for fun
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:40 pm
by pepasystem
Barhroom