Page 19 of 62
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:18 pm
by reberts2
Are the path tracing Ms/sec comparable between fermi and non fermi cards?
i.e. if a gtx 480 score 3.5 and a gtx 660 scores 3.5, are they equal in performance?
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:33 am
by ASyme1
badmilk69 wrote:Dude i started with 3Dstudio 3.0 (2 diskettes)
and yeah a crappy 286 too better than a 8088 right?
Yo Badmilk69
I think I'm right there with you in the old days. I was Mac at time though. Maybe earlier. My first "3D rig" was a Mac quadro 640. 33 mhtz,,24 Meg's of RAM. The hard drive was a whopping 230 Meg's. this was 1992. And yes, I remember getting photoshop on like 3 diskettes. That was photoshop 2.0 I think.
So yeah, I'm old.
Alec
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:50 am
by bepeg4d
ASyme1 wrote:Yo Badmilk69
I think I'm right there with you in the old days. I was Mac at time though. Maybe earlier. My first "3D rig" was a Mac quadro 640. 33 mhtz,,24 Meg's of RAM. The hard drive was a whopping 230 Meg's. this was 1992. And yes, I remember getting photoshop on like 3 diskettes. That was photoshop 2.0 I think.
So yeah, I'm old.
Alec
me too
i started in 1992 with this
http://www.apple-history.com/iivx with photoshop 2.0 on diskettes and InfiniD
ciao beppe
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:29 pm
by kavorka
reberts2 wrote:Are the path tracing Ms/sec comparable between fermi and non fermi cards?
i.e. if a gtx 480 score 3.5 and a gtx 660 scores 3.5, are they equal in performance?
Performance, yes. But those cards have different amounts of VRAM, so that needs to be taken into account. (btw, VRAM has no effect on speed)
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:20 pm
by mbetke
Version 1.11
2x Asus Titan:
13,5 Ms/sec
Reacts very sensible to overclocking. But also heat. Goes down to 12.7 Ms/sec with stock cooler profile.
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:35 am
by ASyme1
bepeg4d wrote:ASyme1 wrote:Yo Badmilk69
I think I'm right there with you in the old days. I was Mac at time though. Maybe earlier. My first "3D rig" was a Mac quadro 640. 33 mhtz,,24 Meg's of RAM. The hard drive was a whopping 230 Meg's. this was 1992. And yes, I remember getting photoshop on like 3 diskettes. That was photoshop 2.0 I think.
So yeah, I'm old.
Alec
me too
i started in 1992 with this
http://www.apple-history.com/iivx with photoshop 2.0 on diskettes and InfiniD
ciao beppe
Funny. I started with Strata 3D back then and soon moved to Infini-d too. That was the first software that I used that had velocity curves. I was floored. I was soon beta testing for them. That was about '95 or so.
Alec
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:37 am
by gabrielefx
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:24 pm
by Refracty
In those days I prefered doing 2D animations with deluxe paint for Amiga
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:29 am
by Dom74
Me too, i was a sort of revelation.
and later, I found turbo silver :
http://www.imaginefa.com/timeline.shtml
Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:58 pm
by itou31
Hi,
I just get my new Titan gigabyte and test it with my small tower (with octane demo 1.10) :
PT wo shadows : 7.32 Ms/s
I have overclock the card with EVGA precision X 4.0 (GPU ofset + 300, and +500 at VRAM)
I'm happy because it performed (OC) as well as my 2x580GTX (OC too 7.37 Ms/s).
less noisy than my 2x580 !!