Re: New Feature Suggestion...
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 11:25 am
I would actually like them to stick with .obj until v2 but I am biased because I've just about got a functional .obj exporter for Solidworks up and running
its not an integrated plugin though
Perhaps the instancing code and translation,scale,rotation requires the new format?
With the ownership change though I think it would be good idea for Otoy to declare some goals/constants out until v2 just so everyone knows where we are going and approx. when after 2 years of mayhem.
As Lionel points out it was back 6 mths ago that the new file format was mentioned....you can't expect people to actively participate in coding when the delivery time is so indeterminate or things never eventuate
Honestly I will be a bit annoyed if they suddenly ditch .obj but I suppose Lionel will be annoyed it they don't.
What ever the situation I hope it gets sorted in the next few months and the business side of Octane stabilises.


Perhaps the instancing code and translation,scale,rotation requires the new format?
With the ownership change though I think it would be good idea for Otoy to declare some goals/constants out until v2 just so everyone knows where we are going and approx. when after 2 years of mayhem.
As Lionel points out it was back 6 mths ago that the new file format was mentioned....you can't expect people to actively participate in coding when the delivery time is so indeterminate or things never eventuate

Honestly I will be a bit annoyed if they suddenly ditch .obj but I suppose Lionel will be annoyed it they don't.
What ever the situation I hope it gets sorted in the next few months and the business side of Octane stabilises.
