OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Forums: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby Seekerfinder » Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:19 pm

Seekerfinder Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:19 pm
smicha wrote:I set path term power to 1 - this may be the reason.

Sneaky hobbits... so you did. I was looking at the CR only. When you have a moment I would appreciate seeing your path term power 0 score for a more accurate comparison.

Cheers,
Seeker
Win 8(64) | P9X79-E WS | i7-3930K | 32GB | GTX Titan & GTX 780Ti | SketchUP | Revit | Beta tester for Revit & Sketchup plugins for Octane
User avatar
Seekerfinder
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:34 am

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby smicha » Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:45 pm

smicha Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:45 pm
Default value of path term power is 0.3 (I assume Bulwerk had this value). Then the score is 41.6 ms/s.
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby Seekerfinder » Wed Dec 17, 2014 9:02 pm

Seekerfinder Wed Dec 17, 2014 9:02 pm
smicha wrote:Default value of path term power is 0.3 (I assume Bulwerk had this value). Then the score is 41.6 ms/s.

That makes much more sense. Thanks Smicha.

Seeker
Win 8(64) | P9X79-E WS | i7-3930K | 32GB | GTX Titan & GTX 780Ti | SketchUP | Revit | Beta tester for Revit & Sketchup plugins for Octane
User avatar
Seekerfinder
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:34 am

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby Bulwerk » Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:49 pm

Bulwerk Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:49 pm
Its like a GPU arms race here! I love it! Gotta say thanks to Smicha and Glimpse for all the input during the research phase of this build.
Also have to thank the guys at Maingear that built this monster and made sure it would not burn its self out. If you want to know more about the build look here http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=43992

4x TitanZ Overclocked on water.
Core ~1245 Mhz
Mem~ 1502 Mhz

DIrectlight
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1

~392 Ms/s
DL_03_CR-1_PT-1.png



Pathtracing
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1

~186 Ms/s
PT_CR-1_PT-1.png
User avatar
Bulwerk
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:04 pm

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby smicha » Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:58 pm

smicha Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:58 pm
:o :shock: :evil: :roll: :? :P :geek: :mrgreen: :| :!: :lol: :o :o :o :shock: :shock: :shock: :? :oops: :oops: :o :evil: :evil: :twisted: :twisted: :mrgreen: :( :o :D
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby rappet » Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:18 pm

rappet Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:18 pm
Aaaaarrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh ! That is outerspace joy!
btw: That is +63% compared AC when looking at one Z... and WC can have 4 of those arrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh !
User avatar
rappet
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 3:57 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby smicha » Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:42 pm

smicha Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:42 pm
rappet wrote:Aaaaarrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh ! That is outerspace joy!
btw: That is +63% compared AC when looking at one Z... and WC can have 4 of those arrrrgraaaraaarararaaarraaaraaaarrrghh !


45-50% is what watercooling gives on 4 cards compared to aircooling (not talking about raisers with more space between cards).

I can clock my strix to 1300mhz and 7000 on memory which gives about 45%-60% speedup depending on aircooled settings. And this is done under 40C on gpus. Once you get watercooled machine you'll never want to go to AC :)
Attachments
DSC_7823.jpg
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
User avatar
smicha
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Warsaw, Poland

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby Tutor » Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:27 pm

Tutor Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:27 pm
1x TitanZ Overclocked on air.
Core ~(from 705 MHz originally to) 930 MHz
Mem ~3506 MHz

Direct Lighting
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1

~81.59 Ms/s

Path Tracing
Pathterm=1
Coherent Ratio=1

~39.16 Ms/s


One Titan Z on Air [However, this is just the beginning - ultimately looking for more than 7 times these scores via WolfPackAlphaCanisLupus1 where all processors - both GPU processors (14) and CPUs (2) - will be swimming in cold water.
Attachments
TitanZ+PathTerm-Coherent=1+NoAlpha1InOp+PTWgpuzMax3Settings.PNG
TitanZ+PathTerm-Coherent=1+NoAlpha1InOp+DLWgpuzMaxSettings.JPG
Because I have 180+ GPU processers in 16 tweaked/multiOS systems - Character limit prevents detailed stats.
User avatar
Tutor
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Suburb of Birmingham, AL - Home of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby grimm » Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:11 am

grimm Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:11 am
2.16 has improved the GTX980's times a bit. All test have CR at 1 and PTP at 1 respectively.

DL - about 33 Ms/sec
PT - about 15.5 Ms/sec
PMC - about 5.06 Ms/sec
Linux Mint 20 x64 | Nvidia GTX 980 4GB (displays) RTX 2070 8GB| Intel I7 5820K 3.8 Ghz | 32Gb Memory | Nvidia Driver 460.56
User avatar
grimm
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:11 pm
Location: Spokane, Washington, USA

Re: OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!

Postby Tutor » Fri Dec 26, 2014 7:27 am

Tutor Fri Dec 26, 2014 7:27 am
7xGTX780TI - no overclocking - air cooled

DL - 168.47 Ms/sec
PT - 136.86 Ms/sec

PathTerm = 1 and Coherent Ratio = 1.
Attachments
7xGTX780-TI+DirectLighting-Coherent=1+NoAlpha1InOp+DLgpuzMax+0MHzCPUSetting.PNG
7xGTX780-TI+PathTerm-Coherent=1+NoAlpha1InOp+DLgpuzMax+0MHzCPUSetting.PNG
Because I have 180+ GPU processers in 16 tweaked/multiOS systems - Character limit prevents detailed stats.
User avatar
Tutor
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Suburb of Birmingham, AL - Home of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute
PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:21 pm [ UTC ]