pixym wrote:FamilyGuy wrote:daft_punk - its 3-4x times faster than what card?
I would also like to know this answer…
daft_punk wrote:pixym wrote:FamilyGuy wrote:daft_punk - its 3-4x times faster than what card?
I would also like to know this answer…
It's a rough estimate: 3-4x faster than a GT200 class GPU (from GT240 to GTX 285).
Did some research on this forum wrt performance of different cards in the chess scene at the default camera view (this view http://img222.imageshack.us/i/octanedemo07a9000gtx480.png/)
GTX 285: 6.5 Msamples/s (http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4205#p4205)
GTX 480: 12.75 Msamples/s (see first post, default camera view)
8600M GT (my card): 0.61 Msamples/s
Please add your own card+score for the chess and spaceship scene.
Sam wrote:GTX 260 direclighting 11.65 MS/s __ 23 fps
GTX 260 pathtracing 6.55 MS/s __ 12 fps
Im faster than the GTX285
n1k wrote:Did he use 8000 or 9000 version of octane? If 9000 was used than gtx 480 is 10 times faster than my 8800 gt. Nice:)
pixym wrote:These are my results with the both default scenes (8800GT):
- Space Ships: 2mn 25sec
- Chess: 3mn 09sec
Return to Demo Version Questions & Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests