Repost from anandtech forums, test performed/screen posted by user named Dufus...for anyone wondering how far u can get with 1080 performance wise:
ff7darkcloud wrote:Anklove and Uncia, could you let me know the temperatures at the end of the benchmarks for a single 1070 and a single 1080 at stock clocks?
Thanks in advance!
mbutler2 wrote:So if it is the case that two GTX 1070s bench at 241, then one would bench at 120 (my personal tests show linear, so I'm assuming.)
And all of the GTX 980 TI's I have bench at around 125 each.
Then there's absolutely no reason to buy any more expensive 980 TI's.
Not to mention the power and heat improvements over the hot and hungry 980 TI's.
And improvement from 1070 to 1080 has a bigger price increase than performance increase.
So if you have room for a bunch of cards, it seems like 1070s is the way to go. Because cost per speed is more expensive in a 1080.
Any opinions, guys?
coilbook wrote:140 for 1080 and only 160 for titan x pascal. Why is titan so slow?
Timmaigh! wrote:coilbook wrote:140 for 1080 and only 160 for titan x pascal. Why is titan so slow?
Partially cause of its lower clocks compared to 1080 and then, the performance increase does not correlate with the number of CUDA cores. GTX 1060 at half the cores of 1080 gets the score of 90, so 1080 should be 180 instead of 140 too.
Hopefully this will be resolved with the CUDA 8 Pascal optimized versions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests