your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Forums: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion
Carrara (Integrated Plugin developed by Sighman)

your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby protovu » Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:55 pm

protovu Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:55 pm
Hi Simon and Thomas,
You guys would have an opinion on this, or perhaps find it interesting? I posted on the main forum.
Would love to know, thanks.

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=58243
protovu
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:30 pm

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby tschwenke » Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:26 pm

tschwenke Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:26 pm
Hi,

Looks interesting :)

Already thought about it, but decided not to do it because of the big distance between myself and the seller. So, I'm not a big help here :?

Best wishes,
Thomas
http://www.thomas-schwenke.me
Houdini 18.5 || Win10 || i7 + 1 x RTX3080
User avatar
tschwenke
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Germany

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby protovu » Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:14 pm

protovu Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:14 pm
Thank you for taking a look, Thomas.
Best regards,
Rick
protovu
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:30 pm

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby Sighman » Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:47 am

Sighman Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:47 am
You might want to consider building a second rig and using network rendering instead. The second rig does not need to be very powerful since the GPUs will be doing most of the work. You only need a standalone license for the second rig to enable network rendering. You will likely find it cheaper in the long run. Just pick a mother board that supports three double slot GPUs.
Win8/64, I7-4770K (3.5Ghz) 24GB, GTX-980ti (6GB) / GTX-TITAN (6GB)
Sighman
Octane Plugin Developer
Octane Plugin Developer
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:11 am
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby protovu » Fri Dec 23, 2016 4:43 pm

protovu Fri Dec 23, 2016 4:43 pm
Sighman wrote:You might want to consider building a second rig and using network rendering instead. The second rig does not need to be very powerful since the GPUs will be doing most of the work. You only need a standalone license for the second rig to enable network rendering. You will likely find it cheaper in the long run. Just pick a mother board that supports three double slot GPUs.


Thanks, Simon. Kind of you to weigh in.
I have thought about a separate rig, and this is something I have done before with native Carrara rendering.
But, in this case, a big part of my concern is work flow. I really want a quicker response in terms of both mesh compilation and render. The fine tuning spectrum available with Octane is so vast that I find myself exploring all kinds of tangents and variations with Materials, and I have barely scratched the surface regarding path tracing and PMC. And, I am learning that some of the most attractive Materials are sluggish.
With that in mind, would a second rig be leveraged towards live work flow, or only network rendering?

And, pardon my ignorance, but are double slots capable of 2 video cards each? My xeon has 4 as you know, but I suppose they are single slot? I am also not sure I understand the difference between Expansion Backplanes and PCIe expansion clusters. They seem the same, minus the GPU holding frame for the Expansion Cluster? The vendors do not explain much.

Best regards,
Rick
protovu
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:30 pm

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby Sighman » Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:39 pm

Sighman Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:39 pm
By double slot I mean that the graphics card takes up 2 PCI slots instead of one.

I'm afraid I don't know much about expansion options.
Win8/64, I7-4770K (3.5Ghz) 24GB, GTX-980ti (6GB) / GTX-TITAN (6GB)
Sighman
Octane Plugin Developer
Octane Plugin Developer
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 9:11 am
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby protovu » Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:50 pm

protovu Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:50 pm
Thanks, Simon.
Would you say my thinking about work flow makes sense?
protovu
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:30 pm

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby tschwenke » Fri Dec 23, 2016 8:32 pm

tschwenke Fri Dec 23, 2016 8:32 pm
Hi Rick,

Just a quick opinion here on my part :)

If I understand you correct, you have problems with speed. In the past I learned that speed comes either from experience or from really expensive hardware. As you (perhaps) already know, motion blur and depth of field in the NATIVE Carrara render is just really slow. Adding it afterwards in After Effects is much faster; the result is almost the same. I think there are a hundred ways of doing something in Carrara + Octane. And when you add post-production via AE, Nuke, etc. you have at least 1000 ways :)

So, I don't know if this might be something of help for you, but perhaps you have a scene that you feel is so slow that only lots of hardware can do the job... It could be that someone can give a tip or something to speed up the rendering without adding a bunch of new hardware 8-)

Best wishes,
Thomas
http://www.thomas-schwenke.me
Houdini 18.5 || Win10 || i7 + 1 x RTX3080
User avatar
tschwenke
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Germany

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby protovu » Fri Dec 23, 2016 9:00 pm

protovu Fri Dec 23, 2016 9:00 pm
Thanks, Thomas. I really appreciate your input. If there are tips links that come to mind, please email or post. Any way to speed up mesh compilation would help. Simple meshes are not always possible for me.
I do lower my sample rate while animating. This helps a little.

I do use some strategies that involve post production (I have stuck with Premiere for this), and I am certainly open to ideas.
That said, my preference would be to get things as close to final in Octane as possible.
The heavy burden of my work has to take place in the 3D viewport, I believe. Projects often involve mechanical interactions with organic forms, or hands manipulating devices.
Some the transparent organic forms have view changes and transparency shifts that occur simultaneously. These sorts of things get really difficult when split into separate files for later composite.

For example, if you have 3 minutes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk7wQ-TRhxI

You can see in this, that the burden is heavy all of the activity going on in the 3D viewport. Other than a few insets, not much I could do with AE..but maybe I'm wrong.
protovu
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:30 pm

Re: your opinion on this?? PCI expansion

Postby tschwenke » Fri Dec 23, 2016 9:53 pm

tschwenke Fri Dec 23, 2016 9:53 pm
Hi,

Nice animation :)

By 3D viewport you mean the Carrara viewport or the Octane viewport?

Materials look good, but there are some glossy shaders that may take to long to render because of fireflies. Are you using the built-in Octane hotpixel remover?

Have you tried SSS for your organic materials? Teeth and other materials look a bit too glossy.

Question: Do you render static scenes again and again? For example, it seems to me that you render the whole image from 2:24 to 2:28, even if only this little screw driver is moving. IMHO, here, only the screwdriver should be rendered, not the whole scene.

Transparency in Octane is really slow. I usually do it in After Effects if possible.

Be that as it may, looks really good :)

Best wishes,
Thomas
http://www.thomas-schwenke.me
Houdini 18.5 || Win10 || i7 + 1 x RTX3080
User avatar
tschwenke
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Germany
Next

Return to Carrara


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:07 pm [ UTC ]