Expected Performance?

Forums: Expected Performance?
Discussion forum for ORBX on OTOY's Amazon AMIs

Expected Performance?

Postby chris.denovellis » Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:18 am

chris.denovellis Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:18 am
I have been testing out both the Autodesk and regular Windows AMI's.

The streaming performance / latency doesn't seem to be much better than RDP.

Is this expected behavior with the current versions of the AMI's?
chris.denovellis
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:16 am

Re: Expected Performance?

Postby Goldorak » Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:51 am

Goldorak Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:51 am
No, you should be getting 60 fps. What browser/OS are you using, and what is your bandwidth?

Can you provide a screenshot with the status showing your stream fps/rtt etc.?
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: Expected Performance?

Postby chris.denovellis » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:01 am

chris.denovellis Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:01 am
Attached is screen capture.

Running Chrome 30, Windows 8, on an AMD APU.

Firefox is a little better but similar performance.
Attachments
otoy_perf.PNG
screen cap
chris.denovellis
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:16 am

Re: Expected Performance?

Postby chris.denovellis » Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:02 am

chris.denovellis Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:02 am
Bandwidth should be ample.

Docsis3 30-50Mb comcast, wired Gig ethernet.
chris.denovellis
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:16 am

Re: Expected Performance?

Postby Goldorak » Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:30 pm

Goldorak Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:30 pm
chris.denovellis wrote:Attached is screen capture.

Running Chrome 30, Windows 8, on an AMD APU.

Firefox is a little better but similar performance.


You're right, bandwidth isn't the issue here, it's the decode time. You are decoding in ~27 ms, so that is limiting you to <40 fps. Typically each free physical CPU core on your system can handle about 720p30 via ORBX.js. What is the CPU config/speed/corecount of your system? Also make sure you don't have any extra tabs running in the background, as those can also eat up CPU cycles if they are running canvas/flash etc.

I am going to work on a simple substitute native launcher URL this week (that works with identical GUID, command line, etc.), and I'd like to have you retest using that in place of the JS client. This way we'll confirm if JS decode speed is what is dropping you below 60 FPS.

Thank you for the feedback. This is very helpful.
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: Expected Performance?

Postby SimonG » Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:23 am

SimonG Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:23 am
How do you pull up those figures out of interest
SimonG
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:41 am

Re: Expected Performance?

Postby Goldorak » Sun Nov 24, 2013 3:17 am

Goldorak Sun Nov 24, 2013 3:17 am
SimonG wrote:How do you pull up those figures out of interest


Based on broad testing of current Gecko/Chromuim browsers on mid range x86 PC's and laptops.
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Return to ORBX on Amazon AMIs


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:05 pm [ UTC ]