OTOY Forums

abstrax wrote:

riggles wrote:

abstrax wrote:Tim fixed a bunch of issues with the results page. Could you have a look and tell us if that's better now?

Yes it is improved. Getting rid of the pagination helps a lot. And now the "single GPU only" preference persists between filtering modes. Thank you. I'm sure the Titan Z thing will take a bit more time to settle and implement.

Currently, we don't want to change it, because it's always not 100% clear to the user what "1x Titan Z" means. Octane internally deals with GPUs and doesn't care if they are on the same board or not. So, a user who works with Octane and sees "1x Titan Z", will still scratch his/her head and wonder if that means that it's the result of a Titan Z video card or Titan Z GPU.

What we've done is explicitly mentioning multi-GPU video cards in the text above the result list.

It's never going to be 100% clear to everyone all the time. But I think the goal should be being clear to most people most of the time, and i don't believe splitting cards up by singular GPUs accomplished that. The confusion starts in Octane where 1 physical Titanz Z is represented as 2, without saying "(single GPU)" or "(GPU 1 of 2)". So the Octane Bench results are consistent, but consistently unclear. And sure it's more work for you to adjust, but I think the better approach is to think like people instead of making people think like Octane to understand the data. People naturally think 1 Titan Z means one physical card with dual GPUs. Yea, there's a note there, but it'll be as effective as a sticky in a subreddit which no one reads and keeps asking the same questions.

why is there an AMD w9100 card on the top of the list ? did miss something and Octane is supporting AMD cards now ?!

raybender wrote:why is there an AMD w9100 card on the top of the list ? did miss something and Octane is supporting AMD cards now ?!

Who placed the score? What is this suppose to mean?

AMD W9100 Is real for Octane or is joke, support Cuda.

It's fake

This bench is great. Until now i never had the chance to see how gtx590 compared to gtx780ti.

3 gtx590(6 gpus) - score 308
3 gtx 780ti - score 313

well of 780ti deliver the same as the gtx590, but only with 1gpu, and less power consumption, and double vram.

But still the gtx590 do a great result.

Used gtx590 are around 150€ so nice price/performance.
1gtx 590(2gpus) - score 104

cheers
resmas

Hi guys,

I am a bit suprised how well my old GTX580 and GTX590 still compare to the newest NVIDIA Cards... And GTX 780Ti is still performing very good for single GPU-Performance...


Here are my benchmarking results (one GTX590 in my turbobox is broken, I got a replacement (used for 250€), but didn`t have time to replace the old one yet. Will post new results, when 8 oder 9 GPUS are running).


Octane version:
2.17
Operating system:
Windows 7 64-bit
Devices:
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590


Scene, Kernel, Ms/s, GTX980 Ms/s, Ratio, Weight, Score
Idea (by Julio Cayetaño), info channels, 385.714256, 81.25, 4.747, 10, 15.824175
Idea (by Julio Cayetaño), direct lighting, 88.475534, 18.64, 4.747, 35, 55.376318
Idea (by Julio Cayetaño), path tracing, 77.162057, 15.99, 4.826, 35, 56.299187
Idea (by Julio Cayetaño), PMC, 11.973796, 2.88, 4.158, 20, 27.717120
ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev), info channels, 154.389837, 32.48, 4.753, 10, 15.844606
ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev), direct lighting, 58.408017, 12.40, 4.710, 35, 54.953779
ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev), path tracing, 47.630455, 10.02, 4.754, 35, 55.457949
ATV (by Jürgen Aleksejev), PMC, 17.384328, 3.77, 4.611, 20, 30.741517
Box (by Enrico Cerica), info channels, 264.826450, 59.18, 4.475, 10, 14.916439
Box (by Enrico Cerica), direct lighting, 53.738921, 11.76, 4.570, 35, 53.312422
Box (by Enrico Cerica), path tracing, 54.393552, 11.74, 4.633, 35, 54.053785
Box (by Enrico Cerica), PMC, 15.534357, 3.83, 4.056, 20, 27.039786


Total score
461.537082

Cya,
ChrisVis

Well now that we have the Octane 3 announcement. I am really curious about AMD performance - the 290x opencl benchmarks are CRAZY.

hey guys..so the w9100 benchmarks which disappered haven't been fakes ?