OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6

Forums: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6
A forum where development builds are posted for testing by the community.
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby Elvissuperstar007 » Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:53 am

Elvissuperstar007 Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:53 am
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine/Russia

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby milanm » Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:15 am

milanm Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:15 am
MildMustard wrote:I don't know what you guys were testing with Redshift, but comparing Octane Interior and Redshift... I am able to do a 3000x2000 render CLEAN within 4 to 9min so far. (Bucket Mode) I don't care that it cheats, time is money ;) I am very eagerly awaiting denoiser in octane to see quality and how quickly it performs, because I do prefer Octane... but I can't deny Redshift speeds any longer.


What makes you think you can't cheat in Octane? You could bake spherical hdri inside the room and use it as AO environment map that works INSIDE the interior. You can stack multiple portals next to each other to increase their intensity. Not to mention baking.

I'VE SAID IT BEFORE AND I'M SAYING IT AGAIN:
THE ONLY THING YOU CAN'T WORK AROUND IN OCTANE IS GEOMETRY COMPILATION THAT HASN'T BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED SINCE VERSION 1 OF OCTANE AND IS THE SLOWEST COMPARED TO ANY OTHER RENDER ENGINE, BIASED OR UNBIASED. AND IT'S STILL 50% SLOWER ON OSX AFAIK.

I paid for V1, and then V2, and then V3

And now, about SIX YEARS LATER I will have to pay again for V4 to finally see some improvement in that FUNDAMENTAL part for any render engine.

But yeah...right. Light linking and still image Interiors are massive oversights.

Regards
Milan
Colorist / VFX artist / Motion Designer
macOS - Windows 7 - Cinema 4D R19.068 - GTX1070TI - GTX780
milanm
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:23 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby nuno1980 » Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:58 am

nuno1980 Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:58 am
Elvissuperstar007 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4WFxsKt6d8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vn8RYDsb6U
Оо
Ok but I dislike much "Isotropix Clarisse" - "HAND DOWN" as BAD because this program uses CPU only and does not use GPU for rendering!!! :?
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 NEW! <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 21" Sony E530 :D
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby BorderLine » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:34 pm

BorderLine Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:34 pm
Yes, same here ! After waiting and reading "few days" "soon" "etc..." we 've trying Redshit and...... we 've bought 8 licenses for your studio ! Happy ! For Octane, it's very good product but with no dating roadmap (like Corona or redshift),
Customers (yes, we are customers) will see and do tests elsewhere. The conccurence is at the click of a mouse ! Sorry for Octane !
BorderLine
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 5:30 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby milanm » Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:55 pm

milanm Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:55 pm
Just to be perfectly clear.

I'm not going back to polishing turds from biased renders EVER again. I'd rather dumb down Octane or add 5% of compositing skills to the mix.

I'm just saying that we should keep an eye on priorities and be more professional about discussing issues in Octane instead of bashing the whole company at every chance we get. Even when it doesn't make any sense and even when we don't know everything that Octane can do.

In a nutshell... we should all be Raphael Rau. ;)

(edit: yes, I do realize I sometimes sound like a productivity coach having a nervous breakdown.)

Regards
Milan
Colorist / VFX artist / Motion Designer
macOS - Windows 7 - Cinema 4D R19.068 - GTX1070TI - GTX780
milanm
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:23 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby rrbarb » Fri Feb 16, 2018 11:25 pm

rrbarb Fri Feb 16, 2018 11:25 pm
+100
./rrb
rrbarb
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:40 am

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby Goldorak » Sat Feb 17, 2018 12:49 am

Goldorak Sat Feb 17, 2018 12:49 am
MildMustard wrote:I don't know what you guys were testing with Redshift, but comparing Octane Interior and Redshift... I am able to do a 3000x2000 render CLEAN within 4 to 9min so far. (Bucket Mode) I don't care that it cheats, time is money ;) I am very eagerly awaiting denoiser in octane to see quality and how quickly it performs, because I do prefer Octane... but I can't deny Redshift speeds any longer.


Below is a 9 minute 4096 x 2048 render in Octane 3.09 (test 3) that is noise free. Rendered on a laptop (256 OB) and cleaned in real time with the AI denoiser:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... ge=1&ifg=1
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby milanm » Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:47 am

milanm Sat Feb 17, 2018 4:47 am
@Goldorak

Below is a 640 x 360 render of a simple cube that takes ~6 minutes and 36 seconds to render in Octane. :)

Obviously, an exaggerated example of a bug in adaptive sampling.

Edit: To clarify, there is no contribution to the render after ~0.5 seconds. The problem is that rendering doesn't stop after the noise pass is completely green. For example, in a real world scenario test animation would render in 5-6 hours instead of 30 min. Test animations (clay render, diffuse only etc.) are needed to evaluate motion blur and depth of field and often the camera would move from a frame that needs 20 samples to a frame that needs 50000 samples. So the extreme example below renders ~6 minutes instead of 0.5 seconds.



Orbx scene:
6MinuteCubeASBug.orbx
(61.35 KiB) Downloaded 214 times


Regards
Milan
Last edited by milanm on Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Colorist / VFX artist / Motion Designer
macOS - Windows 7 - Cinema 4D R19.068 - GTX1070TI - GTX780
milanm
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:23 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby Goldorak » Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:32 am

Goldorak Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:32 am
If it’s a bug we should fix!
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.08 TEST 6 [latest 3.xx]

Postby milanm » Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:28 am

milanm Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:28 am
Goldorak wrote:If it’s a bug we should fix!


At this point, I am sure you guys will fix it.

For the record, after these last few releases I feel like I can start taking requests from users. It feels like someone was going through all of my posts making sure everything was there. :)

Thanks
Milan
Colorist / VFX artist / Motion Designer
macOS - Windows 7 - Cinema 4D R19.068 - GTX1070TI - GTX780
milanm
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:23 pm
PreviousNext

Return to Development Build Releases


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Wed Apr 24, 2024 5:52 pm [ UTC ]