OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10

Forums: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10
A forum where development builds are posted for testing by the community.
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby Jolbertoquini » Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:37 am

Jolbertoquini Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:37 am
Hi guys,

I have some errors with my renders I update my drivers all good here my test scene. :)
and extra info.

scene stop render after 5min.

Best
Jo
Attachments
PP_test_still.orbx
Orbx scene.
(6.34 MiB) Downloaded 185 times
error.jpg
Log and Screen information
Octane Render for Maya.
https://vimeo.com/jocg/videos
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jocgtd
http://www.hmxmedia.com/
--------------------
Join MAYA OCTANE USERS Skype discussion here :
https://join.skype.com/LXEQaqqfN15w
User avatar
Jolbertoquini
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:08 am
Location: London

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby Buraq » Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:16 pm

Buraq Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:16 pm
Elvissuperstar007 wrote:Оо Forest Pack export to Standalone !!!!!

How did you export to Standalone? Something new ? Give some tips please :D
Buraq
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:24 am

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby Elvissuperstar007 » Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:14 pm

Elvissuperstar007 Thu Apr 28, 2016 5:14 pm
Buraq wrote:
Elvissuperstar007 wrote:Оо Forest Pack export to Standalone !!!!!

How did you export to Standalone? Something new ? Give some tips please :D


everything just
Attachments
2016-04-28_22-13-02.png
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 2422
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine/Russia

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby Buraq » Thu Apr 28, 2016 6:21 pm

Buraq Thu Apr 28, 2016 6:21 pm
Elvissuperstar007 wrote:
Buraq wrote:
Elvissuperstar007 wrote:Оо Forest Pack export to Standalone !!!!!

How did you export to Standalone? Something new ? Give some tips please :D


everything just


Thank you! You are the best :)
Buraq
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:24 am

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby glimpse » Thu Apr 28, 2016 7:45 pm

glimpse Thu Apr 28, 2016 7:45 pm
Elvissuperstar007 wrote:Оо Forest Pack export to Standalone !!!!!


what??? =)
User avatar
glimpse
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 3715
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:17 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby haze » Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:24 pm

haze Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:24 pm
nikostap wrote:Thanks for alpha) vdb grid mapping work great, but can u add a multi-channel grid? To be able to select more than one or combine two(or more) channel as one. Thanks)Image
Because Futefx has two channels the smoke and fire, they need to connect. I know that this can be done in Houdini, but it is not very convenient.


How do you normally combine (or connect) smoke and fire from FumeFX in Houdini? Can I have a .hip please so I can understand what you mean?

Can you send me one of these VDB files? Thanks
User avatar
haze
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 961
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 8:57 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby roeland » Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:03 am

roeland Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:03 am
calus wrote:Where is this "adaptive subdivision surface method" coming from ? and what is it supposed to be useful for ?
As in my test, I can see this have nothing to do with the "Opensudiv catmull-clark adaptative" method, or even a view dependent method...
Is it supposed to be a "surface normal" dependent method ?

No it is using OpenSubdiv in adaptive mode. But Octane can't render bicubic patches so it will render polygons instead.

Tesselation will be finer around vertices which don't have exactly 4 neighbouring faces, and around semi-sharp edges. The mesh you show is the expected result on a cube. You'll see the smaller polygons around the corners (which have 3 faces around them).

--
Roeland
User avatar
roeland
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 1808
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby calus » Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:46 am

calus Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:46 am
roeland wrote:
calus wrote:Where is this "adaptive subdivision surface method" coming from ? and what is it supposed to be useful for ?
As in my test, I can see this have nothing to do with the "Opensudiv catmull-clark adaptative" method, or even a view dependent method...
Is it supposed to be a "surface normal" dependent method ?

No it is using OpenSubdiv in adaptive mode. But Octane can't render bicubic patches so it will render polygons instead.

Tesselation will be finer around vertices which don't have exactly 4 neighbouring faces, and around semi-sharp edges. The mesh you show is the expected result on a cube. You'll see the smaller polygons around the corners (which have 3 faces around them).

--
Roeland


Hi Roeland and thanks so much for your answer.

Right I can see now that this is the cage mesh refinement part of the adaptive Opensudiv method.
adaptive.jpg
adaptive.jpg (11.7 KiB) Viewed 2945 times



So i have more questions:

- 1/ Is it supposed to be used as is? I can't see what it can be useful for (as octane can't render bi-cubic patches but only the cage).
We are missing a second step of global refinement, at evaluation time, relative to the view.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uogAzQoVdNU

- 2/ Or is it only the first step of the implementation and Octane will be able to render bi-cubic patches approximation in future version ?
If this is the case, WOW :shock: ! Assuming the VRAM usage and loading time to be much much lower than for uniform method this will be a game changer against CPU renderer !! :D
and eventually could also be used for hair, particles primitives, displacement ?

-3/ Or will it be useful only in future implementation of openSubdiv which may produce different surface type ?
Pascal ANDRE
calus
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 9:31 am
Location: Paris

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby gah5118 » Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:10 pm

gah5118 Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:10 pm
a few of the passes are still messed up when saving as exr from batch

When saving out as a exr package from batch render, a few of the passes are messed up

ones that I know of through a few renders are:

roughness
index of refraction
ao


Also, I hope to see more flexibility in the batch render script such as integration of the render pass exporter.
Windows 8.1 | i7 950 | GTX 780ti | 24gb ddr3
gah5118
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:25 pm

Re: OctaneRender™ Standalone 3.00 alpha 10 [latest 3.xx]

Postby rogerteddy » Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:36 pm

rogerteddy Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:36 pm
I am not sure if this is a bug and if its a bug I am not sure if its related to plugin or core, so I post it in both places.

As you can see the attached Image there are some polys broken as more far away the model gets from the camera. The tyreprofile is made by displacement. I checked the mapping - everything is fine. I checked the texture, its a png with hiigh resolution of 8k + 2k. It just a part of the profile which is tiled around the tyre.

Image

Any idea?

Kindly rog
rogerteddy
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 6:31 am
PreviousNext

Return to Development Build Releases


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:56 pm [ UTC ]