Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Forums: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480
A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby radiance » Sat Apr 10, 2010 3:58 pm

radiance Sat Apr 10, 2010 3:58 pm
i think we should do some propper benchmarks once we have some GTX480 cards in the community.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
User avatar
radiance
 
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby RayTracey » Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:39 pm

RayTracey Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:39 pm
radiance wrote:i think we should do some propper benchmarks once we have some GTX480 cards in the community.

Radiance

I fully agree. Just one more thing though:

pixym wrote:I used version 1.00 beta 1 with octane8000.exe
- SpaceShips scene is 2,16 times slower than gtx 480
- Chess scene is 2,25 times slower than gtx 480

I reproduced both scenes in Octane with directlighting and pathtracing and I've noticed you're using directlighting in both your scenes. Look at the shadow under the spaceship: it's blueish in this pic, but not in yours. Also the pawns in this image are brighter then in your picture because they're indirectly lit. The difference between directlighting and pathtracing is not easily visible in these scenes. (To change to pathtracing, it's not enough to just choose pathtracing, you must double click on the button "Preview Configuration" in the Graph editor, then click once on the button "Mesh Preview Kernel" and in the right-panel change "directlighting" to "pathtracing" in the drop-down list. You'll see that Megasamples/sec will halve. I made this mistake too.)
RayTracey
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:58 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby pixym » Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:50 pm

pixym Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:50 pm
I will do what you wrote once at office, right now I am home.
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - 32GB - 2 GTX 1080 TI - Win 10 64
NET RENDER : MB Biostar TB250-BTC Pro - Celeron 2C/2T - Open "Mining" Rig - 2 RTX 2080 TI - Win 7
pixym
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby pixym » Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:54 pm

pixym Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:54 pm
Is it possible to have the .07 demo version in order to really bench?
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - 32GB - 2 GTX 1080 TI - Win 10 64
NET RENDER : MB Biostar TB250-BTC Pro - Celeron 2C/2T - Open "Mining" Rig - 2 RTX 2080 TI - Win 7
pixym
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby pixym » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:05 pm

pixym Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:05 pm
FamilyGuy wrote:daft_punk - its 3-4x times faster than what card?

See here:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php? ... tcount=344
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - 32GB - 2 GTX 1080 TI - Win 10 64
NET RENDER : MB Biostar TB250-BTC Pro - Celeron 2C/2T - Open "Mining" Rig - 2 RTX 2080 TI - Win 7
pixym
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby n1k » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:50 pm

n1k Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:50 pm
Wow! Really impressive speed!
[email protected], 8gb RAM, Gainward GF 460 GTX 2048mb,Win7 64bit.

http://continuum3d.blogspot.com/
User avatar
n1k
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby RayTracey » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:38 pm

RayTracey Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:38 pm
Don't get blinded too much by these numbers. As radiance already said, it's better to wait until someone here has a gtx480 and can bench some more complex scenes (like the Death Star trench).
RayTracey
OctaneRender Team
OctaneRender Team
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:58 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Octane benchmark results on GTX 480

Postby pixym » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:37 pm

pixym Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:37 pm
My result with Path Tracing:
Chess render Time: 8m09
SpaceShips render Time: 5mn07
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - 32GB - 2 GTX 1080 TI - Win 10 64
NET RENDER : MB Biostar TB250-BTC Pro - Celeron 2C/2T - Open "Mining" Rig - 2 RTX 2080 TI - Win 7
pixym
Licensed Customer
Licensed Customer
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies
Previous

Return to Demo Version Questions & Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:42 am [ UTC ]